Recent content by TimberedZulu115

Thank you for understanding. I'm honestly losing hope and have stopped trying to debate with these people. It's straight up like talking to a wall.

https://civilnetworks.net/community/threads/us-requires-ssl-c%C3%A9daris-dare-rov%C3%A4toires-grey-suit-pac3-lore-approval-request-3.29871/#post-213033 https://civilnetworks.net/community/threads/uk-ruby-fixed-in-compliance-with-rules.25349/#post-179555...

Cool, thanks!

I never said they were malicious. Now, im always one for discussion, but I dont like talking to people who throw insults, but I'll bite. You call me a broken record, but when I look at this thread, all I see is "Rule is not needed, its about quality, not animalistic pacs." over and over...

Now, the main issue here, is the fact that staff is not telling the truth. It doesn't take much, all you have to do is go into the pac forums and look for yourself. I honestly dont know what else to tell you. There is so much evidence right here. I have links, screenshots, and more, yet you...

Please read the post and the thread. Everything has already been explained.

You know what I mean. I said anthro because anthropomorphosized animals is too complicated of a sentence to type over and over again and i want to save people's time, like you, by not making them have to look up words just to read my suggestion. Try saying that word five times fast.

You make no sense. You said it shouldn't be made a rule, then explained exactly why it should be put into the rules. Also, we were talking about some of your denials in particular. The screenshot of the denial on my suggestion post is one of yours. Can you please shed some light on what you...

FINALLY SOMEONE GETS IT. Even after screenshot, links, and edits, people were still misunderstanding and trying to gaslight me that nothing is wrong, or supporting the suggestion for all the wrong reasons.

I 100% agree. I made this rule suggestion on the premise of them not approving any animal pacs and stating that they will not approve any anymore. So if they are going in this direction, which they already have, then they should change the rules to reflect that. They either need to change the...

Great pacs. They were approved all the way back in 2023 though. There hasn't been a single approval this year.

lol, so you did see that and didn't reply because you were wrong. Having said that, this entire thread is about staff rulings and a certain pattern to them. You're just stating the obvious that everyone already knows. Speaking of rules and threads, have you been unbanned yet? By the way, the...

My man DID not read the thread before posting.

Thats the problem though. You do not want this rule added, but it already exists, just not in the rulebook. I dont want it added, i want players to be able to play as these characters. I fully support animalistic characters, but the staff does not. All animalistic pacs are denied, since 2024...

You are confusing me. You just saw multiple pac denials saying the same thing and admited that the denials were shoddy. The ones that I sent you. That was not a one instance denial. I can send more if you want. You and others keep saying that it has nothing to do with animal pacs but the overall...