Recent content by Zen

+Support - Lots of great ideas - Been cooking hard on IA so far - Experienced - I still hold a grudge against you for being at all involved in the existence of IST - truly unforgivable

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: Make outer electrical centre doors CL3 with override for Tech Expert job. Note: this means the outer door, not the inner door that leads to the lighting/teslas/etc. controls. Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion...

This suggestion was made by a group including both UK and USA players. I don't know the exact reasoning for why that was done, but I will say that UK IA were a bit split on whether it should have been done (I'd prefer they don't have it). The reasoning I can see is that IA can arrest...

They always do after like 10/15 minutes or something, as long as the door doesn't move in that time. Either that or staff are silently spamming door repair command for no reason.

I feel like you have perhaps misread the suggestion. As it is, all doors auto-repair themselves after a certain amount of time that really isn't that long (excluding doors that auto-close, so I'm assuming it's based on when they were last closed or something like that). This means that after...

I'm conflicted on this. While a part of me thinks that maybe you could with SL support, huge work and a clean slate, this has also been an issue for as long as I've been on the server, apparently even longer, and with multiple entire different sets of SC and ISD. There's been clean slates...

I love Tech Expert gameplay and RP. Mass breach happens, every door gets broken, I'm working my way through them, I suddenly get spammed that the door is already fixed, and magically every door is fixed. An E-11 calls me to fix doors in HCZ for once, we get there, the door isn't broken because...

I feel like overall the points you have made here favour a +Support over a -Support. You've brought up that even on other servers that run SC differently, this is still an issue, which would indicate that there is a problem with the concept itself, and not just "you're making it a content issue...

~Neutral The knockback is annoying and ridiculous, but also zone control is already an issue that I'd like to see made less so. Every breach is just: Get out of HCZ Go to medbay/D-block area Kill farm (Optional) Get let into PW by some dumbass opening the BD Kill farm Get recontained after 20...

SA has a total of 7 people. SC has 4 each, totalling 8, plus unlimited assistants, plus an entire regiment each, with a cap of around 40 (not sure the specific cap, can't be arsed to check right at this second). You are going to see SC/ISD-related people much more just because of sheer numbers...

+Support on the overall idea of changing how it works -Support on half the specific ideas The idea of access control failing is a decent one, but as it is currently implemented, it is extremely tedious and not very interesting. There's a lot of ways that it can be reworked, with some vague...

The reason for that is that to some extent, the specifics of the changes in response to this would be worthy of their own suggestions. E.g. IA rework has one already, which is in review or something like that, an SA rework needs properly considering, etc. - I also trust current CT/SL's ability...

Even with Site-9, all of what has been mentioned will remain an issue on 65.

While some parts of the how are vague, this is partially on purpose (at least on my end), as this is something that would need a lot of work to plan out and carry out, and while I generally don't trust Content Team's ability to read, they and most of current (UK at least) SL do generally do well...

I think that's more of a limitation with how those work. E.g. ERT can only heal themselves to 100