Recent content by Zen

I can't imagine why there might be a lack of players for such a well polished role with such great progression opportunities

Would probably be a good idea to either introduce that system or to rebalance them around that not existing, then. Are there any videos or anything of that system in action? And would it be feasible to add it if it was desired or would it need major changes to be compatible with SCP?

-Support This is just ruleplay over roleplay and makes no sense. Why tf wouldn't other security teams on site respond to D-class magically obtaining guns and trying to break out? D-class already break out and riot too easily, making it worse via insane rules is the opposite of what we need.

For the sound, I think maybe something like having it make noises much less frequently and more quietly, in combination with having a random chance for them to play even if it isn't around would be good. As it is, it's just a matter of "Oh, I recognise that sound effect, that means 966 is here"...

966 is so fucking loud and easy to detect, it's unreal. You can hear it from a mile away, you can see it with NVGs and CCTV, turrets can see it. It has zero health and zero damage. It needs reworking. Something where it is actually able to effectively stalk people (not loud as hell) and kill...

I main a non-combative role, my guy. I'm speaking from experience. I once spectated a pair of CI DCs on USA and watched them struggle for like an hour to steal some 008 syringes because they couldn't figure out how to hack a CL4 or that you couldn't door fault an airlock - and not once did E-11...

That's just because UK CI are actually decent at combat. You fight USA CI and think it's not that hard and don't realise you're playing on easy mode.

It's crazy how that isn't what I'm suggesting. I'm suggesting that SL be able to place down a shared chem vault, with a permissions system similar to the fridges, where anyone with permission to access the vault be able to add or remove from it. The idea is basically "what if the fridges were...

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: Replace the shared chemical fridges with shared chemical banks, similar to the personal chem banks available via subscription. These would have the same shared access, logs, restrictions, etc. that the current fridges do, but otherwise work like the...

Then make it not work that way as you add it to the menu. It already has issues like the one you mentioned when moving - rework it so it's all in the menu and works reasonably

tbh it shouldn't be a SWEP, it should just be part of the context menu like the single-motion gestures are

This seems more like a bug report than a feature request

E-11 recently asked ISD to hold the HCZ checkpoints while they did a training. Really gonna hold up well the moment CI or 682 or whatever turn up.

I only started playing at the end of 2023 and didn't get involved in IA until later. All I can tell you is that the non-combative rules even with the later change never made sense and only caused problems. Most of the server couldn't read so they somehow understood it to mean they were...

I don't know where you got that quote, but the rules used to say "Internal Affairs Department (May not actively seek out combat in relation to raids and breaches)".