Content Suggestion NVG Adjustment/966 buff?

Content Suggestions will be reviewed by Content Team weekly, please allow time as not everything can be reviewed at once.
What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
It intends on changing how NVGs work. Currently you can wear then with facility lights on or off and there is little effect to your vision with NVGs on and facility lights on.

I believe it would make sense for NVGs to essentially white-out your screen if equiped with facility lights on. When facility lights are off they operate as per usual/currently do. This will also mean lights will have to be turned off during a SCP-966 breach to easily identify it whilst also sacrificing standard visability for personnel without NVGs.

SCP-966 isn't particularly a strong SCP and is most definitley a stealth SCP which is how it should be played provided people don't scream over TS "966 is hitting me". This should make foundation have to consider turning lights off during SCP-966 breaches or leave them on and deal with the conserquences as such.

Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
With 2.2k threads in SCP-RP Suggestions resolved I am sure something of such has been suggested at one point in time however when I was staff there wasn't much indication of this being suggested nor recently.

Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
- More realistic NVGs
- Better SCP-966 breaches and will make the SCP used more often??

Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
- Inconveniences with breaches (which is the point)

Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
NVGs are arguably too powerful especially against SCP-966 and I believe there should be some sort of sacrifice faced with NVGs as seen with scrambles (protection drops when looking at congnito hazards).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: James V

Snake

#1 Revolutionary Hater
Senior Administrator
SCP-RP Staff
Content Team
Donator
Group Moderator
Dec 20, 2023
820
10
163
61
The moment you put an "or" in a Suggestion they don't know what to do.

As @Snake said before, it's not up to CT to adjust a Suggestion. So better hope you type it perfectly
It's not that we will never do this, however our 2 hour meeting would be even longer if we spent our time filling in the holes in peoples suggestions. If its overly ambitious and isn't very specific its odds of being accepted are much lower. We cannot dedicate over half an hours a discussion to every other suggestion because it isn't complete.
 
It's not that we will never do this, however our 2 hour meeting would be even longer if we spent our time filling in the holes in peoples suggestions. If its overly ambitious and isn't very specific its odds of being accepted are much lower. We cannot dedicate over half an hours a discussion to every other suggestion because it isn't complete.
That suggestion was 2.5 sentences long, and was very specific about what it meant.
 
Guys, i couldn't care less about one of the 12,000 suggestions Zen posted and was denied for being 5 suggestions in 1.

Opinions on the idea of NVGs being reviewed as stated in the suggestion would be much appreciated for Content Team to review and have player base opinions :)
I'm saying +Support, but that Content has already denied it recently. The suggestion they denied was 2.5 sentences long in terms of the actual suggestion part, so there's no way they'd possibly have not been able to understand it.