Search results

Most of it, yeah. This is mainly supposed to just be updating the wording to be in line with how it's already actually enforced. Having the wording be poor like this just means it can be confusing to newer players who aren't familiar with the difference in how it's enforced vs what the rules...

+Support Although I'm not sure this is supposed to be done via suggestion. When I've requested door overrides be done before, it was done via getting SA permission IC and then asking SL to do it.

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: This would update the current spawn camping rule (1.18) to be in line with how it is actually enforced, and has been for years. The current version is poorly worded and doesn't cover some key things that SL have had to essentially rule on instead...

I'm saying +Support, but that Content has already denied it recently. The suggestion they denied was 2.5 sentences long in terms of the actual suggestion part, so there's no way they'd possibly have not been able to understand it.

I basically resolved it myself within like 1 minute after they left, so it wasn't a huge deal, but like, that was just a more recent example of what I always experience. I'd say like 80% of the time, any requests for SL end up with me just being told they're too busy for that, and it's been like...

That suggestion was 2.5 sentences long, and was very specific about what it meant.

The Maz Hatters?

Believe me, I've tried this. While you yourself might very well respond, that may not be the case for others. Most of the time I just get told they're busy while they're just stood around outside medbay, or they suddenly go AFK or leave the server, or I just get ignored entirely. Like a week...

Oh no, a GM could spoil like one breach before they would immediately get removed. Such long lasting and severe consequences.

imo the best way of implementing it would be a toggle in the F4 SCP menu that just reveals/hides the queue, and it defaults to hidden.

+Support Should be visible in console but not as a toast.

Getting SL to respond even as staff or GM or whatever often doesn't work. A lot either are tabbed out or busy or whatever, or just outright ignore you. +Support on this, though maybe limited to GM+/SGM+. Ideally, it should also be something that you have to click an extra button or just run an...

The humble "Partially Accepted" tag

Me when I don't read

Content already denied this. Though, as usual, they only addressed half the suggestion, so I don't even know if they know that they denied this.

That's just their name now. It has been decreed.

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: The general idea is to rework SCRAMBLE gear. The specifics are: When wearing SCRAMBLEs, tint the user's vision (red, perhaps) and apply a film grain-esque visual effect. At the same time, apply a quiet constant audio grit, i.e. a constant, quiet...

The HMods have famously never messed it up before.

You can just ask SL to do this. If you're not SA/department leadership yourself, just get a document in-game with their signature for this, and then ask SL to do it. You may need to open a Discord ticket for it, in which case it will probably take like a month, but that's how these sorts of...

I can't really comment on what you were like as staff, because you were USA so I didn't see you too much, but isn't your name literally a naming con?