Search results

Whilst I disagree with this suggestion entirely, this is an abhorrent take to have.

Some of your events are relatively poor or could be expanded upon with more detail; Omega-1's event is just... an infobreach. Relatively bland. Alpha-1's event is "omg new anomaly and O5 want to abuse it, lets steal!!" - this could be a some-what decent storyline rather than a single event, but...

the 100 signs around the chamber stating 'DANGER, ZOMBIE VIRUS, DANGER, ZOMBIE VIRUS, 100% LETHAL"

You have good RP ability and you set a good example for others. You could've added some more detail to the application, however. Good luck.

I'm involved in this scenario as I am an individual who is affected by your repeated misbehavior, and made the report today that resulted in your ban. On numerous occasions (not just today), you've exhibited various behaviors that indicate that you are a low quality player and I'm immensely...

It's something funny to consider too; CI always often 'make a deal with the SCP to breach it in return for safe harbour' and the CI players that are always playing these SCPs unconditionally agree o_O

I swear you provided negative support to Remmy on the same basis that you're defending here, despite similar circumstances. Very unusual. I'm not going to leave a +/- Support, though can you explain what tangible pieces of Roleplay you've done in Internal Security recently? Most of what...

people need to afford crates? weapon skins being added to begin with was a terrible idea, as was the idea of crates, but coinflips is ridiculous

this isnt darkrp

You mean.. harming the RP loop with constant breaches? Right.. Regardless, I find no reason to agree in the sense that you shouldn't be picking and choosing the "meta" SCPs to breach - breach what you can, which SCPs are available to breach, and move on

I don't understand how banning CI from playing on SCPs is "nerfing CI" Are people trying to imply that CI's only stable effect on the server is to breach SCPs regularly?

me when ci mains hop on SCP and they all happen to forget to deafen in TS and know the exact locations of remaining ci and the locations of other SCPs...

I don't see why this should be added as a feature; realistically, unless you're anyone 'special', you have no reason to change your keycard. All I see this being used for is to add stupid images to your card's background

Definitely not true

I understand the sentiment behind this, though in my history serving as an ECM, I often found that E11 demanded ERT's deployment in situations where it was simply unnecessary. I think this would be more appropriate for an IC policy where E11 is consulted for ERT's deployment, a 2-step system...

Staff members often receive flak and criticism when handling sits and other various player queries and complaints. If your first retort is to try and "get one over on them" back by making uneducated comments then this isn't the role for you, especially if your comments "slip out". For the...

Your attitude on platforms like the forums leaves much to be desired and is not appropriate for that of a somebody who wishes to be a staff member.

And there's also a reasonable expectation in the foundation that you act professional in your job role. That includes a uniform and expected behaviours and mannerisms. Two fish on your shoulders are not part of your daily uniform.

Can you not dox my dog's face. Thanks. This is a serious RP server. Walking around with fish on your shoulders because your name is 'fish' is not really appropriate

Your cat is going to get fucking dragged down the street