Search results

+"This individual looks like a cross between 008 Zombie Virus and Alpha Warhead. You don't know what either of those things are and as a result are immensely confused."

+Support

Crying +Support

I think the primary thing that needs to be taken into consideration is how CI affects the overall environment. Their primary gameplay loop, while it gels with things like D-Class, MTF, DEA, SCP gameplay, directly disrupts virtually all ongoing RP. I'm not saying this should go -I just think that...

Alright, I'm convinced. +Support

I'm gonna play devil's advocate a little here while also reiterating a bit - How much will 1 more slot actually fix all of this? Or do we just get all of these things again, with the exception that there can just be 3 Assistants at once? Although maybe a little less pain to deal with on FCOM's...

+Support Surprised this isn't already a thing. I guess the closest thing we have right now is cheques, but those are to a specific person and can be easily destroyed/taken back - Whereas this is far more useful for hostage negotiations since anyone in the group can RTB with the briefcase. I...

...What? I don't even play D-Class that often, and when I do, I minge. :skull: I mean, I guess I'm coping at the tens of suggestions that this specific thing's been producing in the subforum over the past month or two?

Honestly, I wish containment beams were CL2 instead. Even just that would be more useful for D-Class against 912 because then it makes it more accessible to them.

+Support W

16 regular PKs, coming up

I'd also like to add to this point that, IMO, if things are the same now as they were back at the start of last year when I was an OSA, the standards for Assistants are (or at least, were) fine - And to my understanding, there were just a lot of good people for the position that wanted it...

What are the tolerances on the ranges? Are you able to specify radii in hammer units or is it literally just s pick of say, yell, etc. ranges? Because I get /me or /looc not having equivalent range to /y - But IMO I feel their range is still too short. Is there no more ability fine-tune it than...

We should start a new server just for Assistants 🔥 Civil Networks Assistant Roleplay

Exceedingly rare Speff L. First off, I don't know where you're getting SL from, since rule suggestions are resolved by SSL+ and I never specify any Staff threshold for deciding anything other than leaving the actual enforcement up to moderator discretion. Secondly, vaguely saying just "a code...

+Support Change /it too, it's the same the range and it's kinda garbo tbh

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: Add something to the Specific Guidelines under 1.12 Realistic Equipment Use about unrealistic/unreasonable (ab)uses of 912 by GenSec, that would constitute a reasonable boundary for the use of 912, which can then be enforced at moderator discretion...

As I keep saying, just add 912 to 1.12. If GSD then misuse it, then point to that.

The primary issue is that for other SCPs, the fact that it's a free and really annoying breach is basically the only reason why you'd want to breach 096. Since 096 is one of the few SCPs you can't really co-operate with for a multitude of reasons that I outline here, as well as it kinda being...

"I'll take FailRP for $200, Alex" If people are calling C2s for anything other than a riot, that's not player interpretation, that's just FailRP.