Search results

I'd say something like - Maybe make the targets validity linger for something like 500ms, but the immediate issues I see with that are being a pain to implement, pain to fine-tune/balance, and potentially causing dissonance in the other direction. +/- Neutral "Netcode was a mistake and we should...

+Support A recontainment care package would make sense.

Honestly... As much as I personally hate removing people's access to parts of the map, I'm fully aware of how ridiculous CI reactor holds can get. The only problem then being that how do you guarantee they just won't find other ways to similar positions? Like what if they get on shields or...

I'm not trying to compel them. It's just been a while since the last closure, things are looking a little rough and with everything happening, it's possible that even some of the things I've raised here might not have even occurred to them. The suggestion simply poses the question. Based on the...

...why does it not stop bleeding 🥴

Have SCPs start on the surface when they breach, that way RP can continue.

My thinking here is that problem was more about metagaming various civvie jobs such as gun dealers being on and potentially supplying CI or such, as well as metagaming checking for trespassing parawatch MC&D is a different and even though they're a neutral faction that can cause problems for...

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: Make MC&D appear on the tab menu as MC&D and not as Civilians. Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?: There was a recent suggestion asking for the same thing for Civilian jobs in general - The difference...

+Support Rework Chef into full-time minge job, open up cooking to everyone else

+Support I want to be able to dunk 073's head under the dispenser tap and dispense harmful chems into him which causes the dispenser to explode from damage reflection.

-Support This is the wrong way around to approach this issue. Things like this are better addressed by content changes to correct gameplay imbalances, rather than just arbitrary ruleplay.

+Support This can be accomplished by reducing the attenuation of the sampling sound.

+Support While 966 is supposed to be weak, it's also supposed to be a specialist stealth-type SCP, which it kinda fails at spectacularly. And then people wonder why it's so rarely played. I know that it's planned to get something similar to 323's stalking mechanic at some point - The buffs are...

+Support But I'm pretty sure the hacking sounds are tied to the actual TE-5 SWEP itself, no?

+Support For the radio thing, that's a pretty interesting idea. I vaguely recall being told in the lead-up to them being released that they were connected in some way and if I'm remembering that right, then this could reinforce that kinda nicely. +/- Neutral On dimension changes, haven't...

Well in that case, why not just leave suggestions like this up, where there is some willingness to pursue the project in some capacity, but no resources/developer interest and it shouldn't go on the backlog. And before anyone says subforum bloat, why not just make some kind of 'Future Revisit'...

That's unfortunate - Does this include GMObjs? 🤔 Is there some way to add a configuration setting to GMObjs to prevent being affected by a storm?

As I said in the OP, I don't know exactly why - All I remember for certain was that it was around the holiday season and that was related and I remember us being told that the subforum may end up being occasionally closed if deemed necessary. I'm simply opening a discussion to pose that question...

...WDYM hasn't been offered? That's what this entire discussion's about. Trying to paint it as some way to lazily avoid the mechanic is very clearly not in the spirit of what the suggestion's about. That comment's mostly just based on Zen previously finding an obscure technicality in...

Whoever ends up resolving this can ask. I don't know if this is a Content thing, an SSL thing or an NL thing. But they can check probably in much better capacity than I can, if a closure would be appreciated. That is also part of the question being asked here, too.