Search results

https://civilnetworks.net/community/threads/scp-rp-suggestion-format.3798/ The door is already lockable I think, just door charges are a thing.... If your suggesting it to be not door chargeable thats gonna make things worse because not even lakehouse has that and its a whole goi technically...

Follow format but uh -Support anything in parawatch spawn will get stolen quite often so not really useful

+support

-Support 1. This is a bad place to put that in the rules and 2. This isn’t needed, as long as parawatch are actually following the rules their pretty much an escaped d class except non combative. D class escaping is worse.

It shows steam id if they aren’t online I think

3/3 Im in Nu7 currently and in ci currently

-Support this would not fit on US server. Also nu7 have a juggernaut already. Grenadier is genuinely a nerf to ci depending on the user also

Oh I guess this is a positive too, GSD jobs are often used for tryouts and this would let them dispense multiple hacking devices

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: Make TE4 a cl2 or cl1 from dispenser Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?: no Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2): CI Alphas are able to hack uh thats really it Possible Negatives of...

Use format

+Support, mainly for the d class getting scrap. that would be a good way to do it

All O5 cards say on the cl4 is their number designations. Why does that need changed to a full title

+support, just because i dont want a character bio and having it not be required would be nice

Sure I would support a toggle but the old chat bloat messaged the entire server besides like d class when people wanted to use actions during events.

I think that might just complicate things more. /act would literally just be to replace people doing /oc [act] during events. Not much changing

To start off incase you didn't know ocomms were recently restricted to certain jobs. This makes things pretty complicated during events or RP scenarios for those who this change effected. My fix is simple, instead of a command like /me which is local to people around you seeing, a 2nd command...

The reason UN currently takes role is so they stay neutral. Even if rangers were just reserves that ultimately creates a not so neutral group which I don't think is intended for the role. My reason for them being separate is to create actual RP with them. Say the UN wants to have rangers keep...

-Support, I support the full removal of a GOI

+support

+Support Alternatively AO could aim better. My issue with it is they just crossfire everything