Search results

I think just those 2 are the main ones that I thought needed more descriptions to them :), and I think the changes you added gives some good bonus information about them.

Hey, It's very cool of you to wish to join the event team as a GM! Just a simple request from me, would you please go over some of your event ideas again to further explain them? (by editing your post if possible). Many of your ideas seem interesting to me, however some of them seem lacking in...

To me it's more about the accessibility for refunds, and not necessarily about punishments being handed out. I've personally already seen people hand out staff refunds for this kinda stuff, and also people being told they can't be refunded for it - I think a more specific ruling would just...

Honestly I wouldn't be as annoyed if I were a DC (because then at least the Code 1 called would've been about me originally), but I actually got found as a 914'd person separate from the CI raid which started the C1. Honestly I still hold my point, but all of your points here are very valid...

I'm not 100% sure how this could be solved IC, because no one is really to blame for keeping it on for too long. I mean I could see it being an IC issue but if so it's an unsolveable one imo. You got damn right it is (kinda - getting caught because the Code 1 has been on for 20 mins after CI...

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: Makes a rule (or adds a clarification rule) about the length of time a Code 1 (Intruder Alert) can remain on after a raid/intruder has initial been called out (or after a 914 has been called out set to 1:1) - I'd recommend a period of like 5 minutes...

+ Support It would nice to have a general rulings around them, and personally I think it's a little powerful that people can just flash their ID whilst still pointing their guns is kinda meh.

+ Support

+ Support This is good.

+ Support I think an easy, and instant, rule fix to this would just be not allowing him to beam SCPs above like 20% - meaning the beam is more utilized for actually re-containing them rather than just slowing them down and annoying them.

+ Support - Very cool - Knows how to control / assist researchers pretty well (from what I've seen) - Some good CL3/4 SCP tests - Did a good lecture a few days ago

+ Support - Had good RP in general - Done some very good / interesting tests - Pretty good app

+ Support - Good Interactions - Good RP - Previous staffing experience - Generally seems like a chill/cool guy

+/- Neutral - Only a small amount of interactions - Prior staff experience - Good application

+ Support - No warnings - Great roleplayer - No negitive interactions (only good ones) - Prior staff experience (very cool)

+/- Neutral I've put neutral because I believe giving MC&D disguise cards would lead to it being abused more than for sneaky fun RP, although I still like the idea itself the possibilities (and what I think people would use it for) seem too abusable.

+ Positive Support (Big) I accidentally made cyanide one time on my civ character with low cooking instead of my foundation character so I failed to make it instakill, I've hated myself ever since.

I think parawatch RP has the potential to be great, but the server is just too much combat focussed nowadays that I don't think it would go amazingly. If parawatch had a buff to allow them to do more then I could see making rules against KOSing them, but currently RP is limited because of...

+ Small Support + Big positive for GOC, in GOC base - it takes 30 seconds to pull someone out, and GOC shouldnt be killing civilians unnecessarily. - Medium netural for Foundation, killing civilians who break in isn't anti-lore and kinda makes sense, it can also take like 10+ mins to kick a...

+ Support - High quality RPer - Good person - Respectable member of the community - Giving him this would get him away from terrorising the D-Class - Doesn't reach the SCP level requirement...