Search results

Considering its called General Security it would make sense they have a lot of jobs, and only two of those jobs manage the entirety of the security force which covers a plethora of content is silly. We have an internal ranking system, which does nothing sadly. It only gives a short amount of...

+Support

Application Accepted Hello @Loviatar, I am pleased to state that your application has been officially accepted! We invite you to join our TeamSpeak at your earliest convenience, wait in the interview waiting room, and put "Waiting for Interview" in your name so we can proceed with the next...

Application Denied Hey @Dr.Ukriane! Thank you for showing interest in being a staff member. Unfortunately at this time; while you're a concurrent staff member on another server we will be denying your application. We would like for players to have their focus on their staff duties for this...

Bro came back to post a clip from a movie made in 1994. What a gangster move.

Well that's completely false. You should re-read the rules once again. 2.4(a) Kidnapping Rules - When a faction member is kidnapped, they must have intentions for the hostage such as execution, interrogation, or making demands to the opposing faction for profit. The hostage's life should always...

That would still be a failrp warning. Thaum's are still unable to use their powers for combative reasons, this rule or not.

The ruling would already prevent them from doing that. Non-combative's, any of them at all would not be lawfully present in a combative situation unless it broke out in front of them. If IA or researchers or any NC are running to combative locations during a C1/C5 etc.. they would be unlawfully...

He doesn't have permission to be there? Person would receive a failrp warning. Just as they would normally? The change effects nothing other than non-combatives defending themselves in a lawful way. Just as they were allowed to previously.

Role owner's Discord ID: .Kore Which Discord server is the role in: Blue SCP=RP Which role are you modifying: Sociopaths Are you adding or removing members?: Adding members Discord IDs of the members you would like to add/remove: bogitos If adding: have you purchased the "Custom Role...

This has nothing to do with the suggestion. This is negligence from IC groups not doing their job which will continue to be a problem across all rulings regardless if this is added or not. None of this has any cohesion to what is being suggested as their are exceptions to the ruling that...

Neither CI or GOC follow the CoC or CoE. They essentially only follow the server rules as neither of them have a need for combative or non-combative rulings, so in a way they would just continue to follow the rulings on who is considered to be non-combative or combative not what those groups...

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: Changing rule 4.4 Non-Combative Personnel from the server ruling of; The day to day duties of the person's job doesn’t require them to involve themselves in combat, these roles and/or departments may not engage in combat unless there are no options...