Search results

More people able to kill helicopters is a good thing btw

+Support MPK/AOR are more a support role during war, giving them access to more gear would be a positive, although perhaps a job limit to add more differentiation between them and infantry regiments.

-support Kamil this suggestion is very unprofessional, as General of the Army of the United Allied Nations you should know better than to put up very toxic suggestions. I will be referring this matter to the Military Police Keepers where the Regimental Command will have you arrest for the...

+support Each time he's applied he's always been wanting feedback and advice from me. Can tell his heart is in it.

Neutral I really dislike the 'no armoured vehicles in enemy territory' rule, it's a ridiculous rule that just restricts RP. In this instance, it does give one side an advantage, but not one that isn't fun to overcome. Remove the rule, if a team is dumb/brave enough to drive a tank through...

1. We would also have full helicopter restocks. With full heli stocks, they tend to fight amongst themselves, air superiorty is only really decided very late on in the war, if at all. 2. Yes, helicopters should absolutely be nerfed, but in relation to your point - what if we have players that...

That is only in the instance of a large war, and it's a risk that SWB/UAF would have to take into account in order to get a large amount of kills. Got to remember, each kill you get is an actual player just trying to have fun on the game. In large wars, sure, stingers can be a nightmare, but...

You didn't, but there is a widening gap between the infantry playerbase and pilot playerbase on the issue of whether helicopters should be nerfed/buffed. The general consensus for pilots is that counters are too strong and that 'helicopters have already been nerfed before'. As for small arms...

So what you're saying is that regiments working together should decide the outcome for a war? It should be up to how the team plays that decides it, and that a single regiment should not be the deciding factor? I'm glad that we agree on something so fundamental to the argument Zapso, that...

Tactic would be a large group of infantry doing enough damage to send you back to base, thus avoiding the endless bombing run. Honestly, and I have to ask, what is your idea here? Why should we be buffing helicopters and nerfing counters? How on earth could you ever suggest that would be...

Neutral Nerf all helicopters and make all stingers one-shot kill (and add in small arms damage)

The current counters are essentially useless if you're on your own, or with another person. Stingers take time to lock on, you have flares and so forth. I want helicopters to focus on dogfighting so that they'd leave infantry alone, removing counters or nerfing counters does not encourage...

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: Want to say first and foremost, this would only really be after Backwater 2.0 has been completed. This would reintroduce something done at server launch, that being a switch between the main maps every 6 weeks. Possible Positives of the...

You're missing the point, also, why should regiments like JAC and 15th be penalised because UAF can't compete in the air? It's not their fault? And yes we should be looking at how to keep PVTs happy, we need player retention back to what it was otherwise MRP will slowly start to die off.

Just because there are a large number of counters - not going to help a fresh spawn vs a hellfire missile. They're all wildly ineffective except for maybe KWKs if they're in the right hands. And yes, small arms fire should damage helicopters, but nobody is suggesting that one person with an...

Most of the people making these suggestions are playing infantry and are tired of being told that helicopters should actually be buffed Helicopters decide the war 95% of the time, infantry don't want to play without any friendly pilots or just switch teams. As infantry I die more to...

That's my exact point - stock management is a very poor and annoying system. It's not at all fun for anyone involved and I feel it's now a case of stockholm syndrome the fact people so wildly adore it. Also you do have to manage stock management, Conquest wars happen maybe once (or twice) a...

‘Sometimes I die when 7 stingers are fired at once it’s literally unplayable it’s not fair for heli regiments’

A lot of people missing the primary point of this: Tanks take out tanks Helicopters take out helicopters The best counter to the things that harass infantry is more of the same things in your own side. We can’t be limiting the fun of a regiment this way. Stock management has never been...

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: This would create a system where all stocks on both teams get restocked as soon as pre-war for Conquest begins. (I swear to god actually read it before you go '-support helis tanks bad') Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2): Currently...