Search results

+Support You've shown excellent initiative and leadership qualities for the whole of UAN. I'd love for you to be part of the team and actually lead wars as an AC as opposed to a COL.

You're saying to not introduce this in case they may decide one day to make tanks vulnerable to small arms fire? That's some mental gymnastics there bud Nobody is going to suggest tanks be vulnerable to small arms fire, tanks are armoured vehicles legit designed to withstand it, helicopters...

Ah yes all those counters that are so effective that helicopters still colo carry wars for both teams. Pilots do be upset that they may need to go repair every few minutes instead of circling our FOBs right click farming kills

Accept it again!!!

A single infantry shouldn't be able to solo a helicopter with small arms fire, but like 5 or more infantry with concentrated fire should absolutely be doing enough damage to drive the helicopter away at the very least. We don't want it destroying with one clip, but want it so that if enough...

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: This would allow MPK/AOR to select whether a crime was an Infraction, Misdemeanour or a Felony, removing it from a selected amount of time. Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2): The positives would be that it allows for a more dynamic...

+support LTCOL/COL are ranks with considerable power, having them be barred from certain areas because ‘we don like other regiments!!!!’ Is poor. We’re all one team

+support It’s objectively not fun if you’re spawn camped by a 360ing hypervirgin pilot spamming enough hydras to flatten China let alone kill your weak ass Damage from small arms fire would give infantry a reliable and very small counter to helicopters, just makes sense

You lot already clog up the forums with your endless applications can you not just pointlessly shitpost thinking you're all funny it actively makes me vomit ty

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: This would split the 'latest posts' section into posts posted in SCP-related areas and posts posted in MRP-related areas as opposed to one shared pinboard Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2): The positives would be that each...

Hello Kiwi/Jack Firstly want to say it's great seeing the A+ team actively getting involved in the debate, it's very much appreciated. I think the concern that's being raised the most is appealing to older players to return. Whilst this would be a slight benefit of reintroducing the older...

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: There are many different aspects of old MRP which should return to make the game more balanced and fairer for newer players. Firstly, the old gun handling system should be reintroduced. Most weapons under this system were lasers, having...

Following the attrition updates, you could just enable territory capture on those killzones. Just to add on to the suggestion

Horatio is the minge persona of Astolfo

-Support Besides what Bogdan said, we already have a huge issue of Snipers just deleting players from higher points. Increasing draw distance will just exacerbate the issue

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: This would add in a new war type that focuses on the three territories that are immediately contensted. This would be similar to a lane war, but instead of all three territories being on a single lane, it's one territory per lane. For example: If...

+support Makes sense

+support

-Support I appreciate the work you have put in to MPK the past week, but to see you opt to resign and then follow that with an SCP resignation appeal isn't really acceptable. You came in to MPK presumably via the return scheme that Cloak implemented, that was designed for players to come back...