Search results

+support If anything I'd suggest ERT have a mobile camera viewing tablet. Like, it views the stationary cameras around the facility.

Good thing I didn't buy it! Lmao QBZ and VHS still on top.

-Support I think a rule forcing people to participate in a RP scenario is a bad idea, especially interrogation/torture rp. 1. Because some people take it too far/get really edgy about it. 2. Some people just aren't comfortable with torture RP, and that's not something we should force on...

Hell naw yall get money from dealing drugs on the side!... TO ME! +Support

+support Ngl when I'm on a scp, if a mother fucker sends a D-Class in with a syringe and a pat on the back to just sample me with no other RP, that D-Class is dead if I can't get the researcher. We're told to RP, not to let them get their samples and go.

+Support I wish to taste the SCPs. What would a 939 burger taste like? Idk. But soon we will!

Absolutely agree. There's SOME rules that are clarification that you wouldn't instantly know unless you fine comb rules or can be accidentally broken (not allowed to enter D-Block unless code 2, fear rp works with gun out in 2 v 1, no cyanide with gag.) But there's also rules like no arming...

Well tbh it's not even needing a silver tougne but a lazy mod. I've seen people RDM, then be emoting during a sit not giving a shit and mods be like "Well, seems like a oopsie~ no warn~". I get not wanting to be "that server" where every ass scratch is a warn, but in the same time, I feel like...

Naw you guys smelly passives. You deserve nothing good in life. Just stinky A1 guards. +support

Because it's not giving them a strike. Just letting others know "Hey, they KNOW this rule." Because I've seen multiple times people who know there's a rule getting into sits for the same thing over and over just to slide by saying "Well I didn't know". If you just leave a note they can't do...