Search results

- Support

Neutral + Fair activity, seen a few times as A-1 and the times I did have interactions with you they were good. +/- Few warnings but not that bad. - Only recently got Jr. CL4 role, so I would say you have very minimal CL4 experience to take on another role.

Neutral +/- Fair activity, seen 2-3 times recently. - No CL4 experience.

- Support - Not enough activity on the server as expected hence why I've had no interactions with you. - Poor application/short and quite a few grammatical errors. - No CL4 experience.

Neutral slightly leaning to +Support +/- Unsure about long-term activity but I've seen him 2-3 times as Agent and I've had one good recent interaction with them. - No CL4 experience. +/- Few grammatical problems in application.

+ Support + Quite active and I like it. + A few interactions with good endings. + Only one warning. + Good playtime. * Good staff experience. +/- Felt that when you said you can deal with sits more efficiently with your past experience wasn’t such a great point as it made me feel that you're...

- Support - No interactions, never seen you before. - I do not see any good reason for why you want to be staff or why you would be special over others, other than you saying you have past experience. - Instead of answering the questions you’ve given examples of rules being broken and you’re...

- Support + Good Playtime - Too many warnings - E-11 Blacklist - No previous staff experience - Minimal interactions nor have I seen you on the server as much as others so can’t say much about your “5-8 hours” claim. - Could work on your formatting.

Neutral + High playtime - Not many interactions. - Haven’t went into depth enough with your application. - I’ve noticed that in your previous application you had said something about previous experience in Serious RP servers but in this one you have taken that out. So I’m a bit confused.

- Support - Broke one of the recruitment rules so I fail to trust you about knowing “all the rules”. - Too many warnings - No interactions so I can’t say anything as for activity - You seem to have repeated some of your points for the last two questions, not only that you haven’t explained what...

I’ve seen what you’re like, I’ve had people tell me things about you so that’s how I know. I didn’t say you’re immature because of your warnings as that was a different point I made..

+ Support + Active + Nice interactions - Haven’t explained enough what makes you greater than others

Neutral leaning to + Support + Seen you a few times on as NU-7 I believe + You have some experience - Not as many interactions

- Support - Immature - The excess amount of warnings may show that you are unreliable and can’t follow rules/policies Due to the reasons above I don’t think you’re mature enough to understand directions and are highly likely to make incorrect judgments. Being the Dept. Director of GENSEC is a...

+ Support - I’ve had quite nice interactions with you before - Active - You have the experience and understand your responsibilities But what I don’t understand is why you’re not talking about your past experience as a GENSEC Captain because if I’m not mistaken you were a Captain once.

Neutral leaning to + Support + It seems that you have enough experience - Considering the fact that you have about 5-8 RP names I have no idea who you are so I can’t say you’re active Other than that considering the fact that Intelligence leadership is inactive it would be nice to have someone...

Neutral - No past experience - Immature based of experiences - Had alright interactions with you + Activity

- Support - Poor grammar - Don't notice you enough to really know you - Application not developed enough to prove you're ready for a big role like this

Neutral - Don't see you on as Consultant - Quite a short application considering it's for such a big role

- Support - Short application - Never seen you on as IA - IA doesn't just deal with CoE - You say that you only want to train agents - Not enough detail about what makes a good document