Search results

Just because an ability was added and given to one specific kind of reality bender, does not necessarily mean more reality benders should have that ability, too - In fact, it more often than not means the opposite for a multitude of reasons such as balance disruption and unintended/detrimental...

No. ...HIGHLY abusable with potentially immensely undesirable effects - We gate off certain things for a reason. Especially 008. There is no circumstance under which this would be permitted. Yes - But it is very difficult to make and finicky to work with - And if I were to make some, go down...

I see. That is unfortunate, but it makes a lot of sense. I appreciate that this cannot be done in a timely fashion - And may not be worth the effort, which is a possibility which I vaguely covered in my post. I hope there will at least be a patch for the potential exploit regarding the spawn...

You need $1000, to open a support ticket and a community supervisor to bribe. Good luck.

I know this is the AI speaking without any knowledge or context but like, Neuro Controller progress is public. @Lord Mirai (未来) 's been doing some really great stuff from the looks of it. I imagine it'll release sooner than Site 9.

Inquiry Response Hi @Kees Van dr spek, Thanks for taking the time to make an inquiry. The Philosophy & Sciences Division has convened and arrived at the following conclusion: No - Water is not wet. This is a direct and final judgement from @Emilia Foddg, who is presently the foremost...

+/- Neutral I find this interesting. But even though I know there is a desire to improve the breach experience, I also know that there is significant hesitancy surrounding adding passive perks to this aspect of gameplay, as well as any technical issue it could cause and limitations that may...

+Support I get the frustration with how restrictive these roles are and agree. But unfortunately, this will likely not be accepted because of... I guess, somewhat justified? Potential fear of people abusing the resulting greyness to try and worm their way out of sits and FailRP warnings they...

(Disclaimer: I am not back. I have simply found a compelling topic (IMO) for a suggestion.) What does this suggestion change/add/remove: Presently (to my knowledge and recollection of how this works), SCP jobs can be flagged onto from the current character regardless of faction - This suggestion...

Yes. :(I get why - But I like the idea of spending your arrest duration having zero-stakes knife duels with your cellmate (Which is a realistic thing to happen while arrested... Maybe not the zero-stakes part, but) This is directly FailRP, but there's no reason not to mechanically prevent this...

+Overwhelming Support I'm not giving Discord my fucking phone number. :mad:

You may also withdraw your suggestion, simply by saying that you would like to do so.

Not Staff, but to further help with this, for @Clementine, the quoted text is from the suggestion format post, in the sticky threads at the top of this subforum and to my understanding, its content is generally enforced as rule. Honestly, having the FAQ and that be separate posts I feel causes...

+Support + Active. + Have only had good interactions with this individual. + Good fit IMO.

+Support Nah, put the secondary spawn for CMs in 008 instead 🔥🔥🔥

+Support Time is a flat circle.

Additionally, in my experience, if you just do model bone merge, it doesn't do blink animations. Entity override does. ...At least on models where blinking is supported.

...As in giving comms? Mechanically? Inter-faction comms such as F-CI, F-GOC, CI-GOC, giving any faction's comms to D-Class or allowing them to be naturally obtainable? If so, no. I think that would be too abusable. I can understand the RP purpose and I think there some interesting cases where...

I've ideated replacing 966's CC with some kind of quick, biometric ease-of-access elevator into atrium and moving 966 somewhere else... Maybe on the other side of atrium, like near inanimate & reactor? - Ideally somewhere convenient for 966 and inconvenient for Foundation. It would make a...

We have perfectly fine, existing rules on document stealing. This is not necessary. Sanctioned intrafaction document stealing generally only happens in specific RP situations and usually by roles that wouldn't be mechanically frustrated from doing so. Unsanctioned intrafaction document stealing...