Search results

no

Neutral I'd +Support if restricted wars could only be minors or victories, but quite often assets are used to prevent a major vic on restricted wars so, I'd say for that I don't agree. If restricted wars were changed to not have major vic campaign score value, or maybe 1/2 of the campaign score...

It is

real

Overall the whole weapon changes were done and decreased TTK substantially with all the rifle dmg being like halved. The TTK is still almost instant with LMGs though, so they're just instantly superior in every way, fire rate, dmg, mag size obv, plus they've got fuck all recoil like the rest of...

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: Nerfs LMGs. pretty self explanatory Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?: Sure, plenty of times. The stats of LMGs have been either too OP or too weak for ages, right now they're too OP. Possible...

-support dev time just remove both of the fuckers

Name: Jason M. Steam ID: STEAM_0:1:522168528 Previous Rank (convert if required): GM Who demoted you?: Yeke Date of demotion?: March 2024 What is the case against you?: Being involved in a discord server containing members from SCPRP/MRP in which community rules surrounding external discord...

The jobs are already restricted to when its 2:1 outnumbered, and its given out 1 job per 5 people

Would be nice to implement that change too. Suit hitboxes were fixed in the hitboxes made by Kermit from what I know, they were just never uploaded!

+Support I love trevor philips

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: Title is self explanatory. These are two fixes that could really easily be implemented, just with support from I believe Superadmins, maybe Auburn. Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?: No...

More than 100 point diff atm

Idk man whatever fix requires no dev time (Since were not getting it if there is any dev time) MRP needs quick fixes, no other fixes available atm.

This guy just didn't even read the first sentence of the suggestion.

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: Allows (If both Senior HC + SL agree) for a side that is suffering from atleast a 100 campaign score difference to end a campaign early through a forced baseraid (Similar to what happened a few days back). This could also be in the form of: - Ending a...

Wouldn't be opposed to content team deciding some kind of balance like that. Overall though I do think KGB has a pretty powerful kit. Maybe one more slot on their anti armour job, or adding a stinger to the job could compensate.

9/10 times you use the shield it's "headglitching" even when it doesn't seem like it to the user. Perfect example is the barn image. Punishing people for using the shield by warning them for headglitching as it is isn't the right approach.

Neutral I don't play SCP so I will not comment.