Search results

Suggestion AcceptedHi @Hoxton , Your suggestion has been accepted. This has already been accepted in the past we are looking into getting it reimplemented Thank you for taking the time to make a suggestion

+Support - Great war leading actually plans rather than "go here" - Active - SAS not in the best place atm but is getting better - Temper although not that big of an issue Goodluck!

+Support -Good staff -Most inactive O1 ?

o7 Helped me with like 1 document ?

-Support

Suggestion Denied Hi @parker, Your suggestion has been denied. Content Team has decided to deny this suggestion as the majority of the community seems to be in agreement that it is not needed nor does the content team. Thank you for taking the time to make a suggestion

+Support -Active -Willing to lead -Expierence in RC ranks -Handles pressure well -Immature at times -Application is a little lacking Despite micky's immaturity at times he has been a great help for 17th helping it recover from our RC/CC being wiped and bring it back to a very competent and...

Suggestion DeniedHi @TailSkipper , Your suggestion has been denied. Content Team has decided to deny this suggestion as we think it is not needed. With ER and PC if you are hired by a team you have the ability to spawn on their FOBs and ER have the ability to place down their own FOBs if needed...

+Support -Active -Good Vtime -Very friendly interactions

-/+ Neutral -Active -Good Vtime -Very few good interactions

+Support -Active -Friendly -Good rule knowledge -Mingey at times

+Support -Active -Decent large scale events -Made an effort to play the server and not be mingey again -Would be nice to see smaller scale / regimental events differ from the usual go here, kill these guys, rtb.

Neutral -Active -Previous SA -Not heard anything bad -No interactions probably due to me maining NATO though

+Support -Decent Vtime -Good interactions -Detail in application

-Support -Decent Vtime -Not many interactions -Activity