Search results

To be honest with you I don't think I've ever had a single issue with Tranq guns on this server, I couldn't even see how they would be impeding anything. If you manage to get hit, stunned and then captured during a raid or operation, you're either WAY too far pushed inwards or you're solo...

I understand your concerns, but I think there’s a bit of a misconception with how this system would function. The timed mini-game isn’t designed to replace RP or force players to sit there clicking buttons every minute. The neutral fallback ensures nobody is punished for not responding, and the...

+Support There doesn't need to be extra external steps to flesh out RP. If everything can be done in character like everyone says it can, you shouldn't need an extra two buttons to validate in character actions through a in character body cam system.

In Theory, the Minigame would be timed to prevent abuse of systems. Each round there is 60 seconds or whatever decided on, to make a decision for the prompt, if no decision is made, a neutral decision will be made for you. Considering the abuse that can come from this, the minigame will be a...

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: It adds a new Containment Interaction System (CIS) that creates dynamic sessions between SCPs and Researchers. Each session generates randomized SCP-specific questions, tracks SCP mood, gauges containment stability, and applies temporary attributes...

-Support All this really does is push the problem somewhere else. If you thought a breach every two and a half hours was ruining your RP to the point where the mechanic needs to be removed entirely, just wait until there are even more Class-D causing chaos instead. I’m sure you’ll enjoy that...

More often than not, applications are judged from a surface level perspective. While it’s useful to understand how the community perceives an individual, if the merit of a candidate is only evaluated after glancing at their application, it suggests that the people making decisions are either not...

+Support I'd honestly advocate for a complete wipe of ALL non essential verbal jargon and start completely new with new guidelines specific to each server, starting with facility standard semi-permanent guidelines that can NEVER change following Department head specific guidelines that can shift...

You can still do testing, just make the breaches less frequent but last longer, if nobody is willing to adhere to spontaneity, then a linear direction is the only option. Shit happens in reality, that's the whole fun of it, not know what will happen. When you want constant control over every...

+Support

Honestly, after looking at and reading all of these comments, what people are expressing is not coherent with how this server is supposed to function. I genuinely have no idea what people are even looking for in RP or if they themselves even know what it is. A quarter of the people are saying...

+Support

Gratz man. Enjoy the fresh air.

I agree chemicals should have an IC position, however no change to chemicals unless its an absolute nerf or removal will alter the RP on the server. People will find a way to get around this and cross server will have vastly different takes on this to such a degree it wouldn't matter if it was...

This is a beef regarding USA and UK. If one ship is sinking, don't bring the rest of the fleet down.

-Support This is standard RP consequence. I’ve never had issues like this, and I actively encouraged my subordinates to make backups, bring bodyguards, and practice situational awareness when moving through the facility. If we’re going to start catering to this level of complaint, we might as...

How about, Give E11 all forms of AA under a tiered specific E11 AA system authorized only by them Add more blast doors and turrets in HCZ to prevent leaks into LCZ. Have a localized ERT deployment for E11 authorized by E11. Retain the same breach measures but make breaches a real fight in HCZ...

A good first step is to firstly identify the disparities between the UK and USA E-11, there's bound to be a reoccurring issue if the regiment itself is the problem. Then we base change off those disparities. Is it truthfully damage? Quantity of breaches? Types of breaches that naturally...

I don't personally believe E11 is as tedious as people make it out to be. Possibly on the UK side but for all intents and purposes it's rather straight forward. The only issue is rallying people and getting enough people to want to stand still for hours on end to get ripped apart by a Reality...

E11 doesn't need more damage they need more utility. If the scope is to keep the server on an RP forward position, utility is far better for gameplay than straight damage, as allocating change to what works best for all parties involved is far more complex through balancing damage than fixing...