What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
[912 rules and possibly some of his equipment as 912 should be allowed access to gensec comms and radio for better communication in many circumstances and that he should be granted a cl1 keycard to open low level doors including D-block to assist for the rule change 912 should be able to refuse orders that are unreasonable or against what his orders intel ethically etc meaning you cant order him to beat d-class to death and no warning in airlock and that this means it'll be more better to improve RP so that things run more smoothly as for the rule suggestion 912 cant be re-contained without valid proof of what had happened for him to be recontained and shouldn't be re-contained if it is deemed necessary by ISD inspector+ or sergeant+ so that if something happens it is their call to recontain him or not and must provide evidence. ]
Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
[Maybe/possibly]
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
[ 1 This can improve RP and decision making in regards of gensec rp and other rp so that things run better 2 if given this rule and equipment this may mean that it can make things run smoother leading to quicker reaction being taken in regards of d-block RP and etc.]
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
[1 this can interfere with certain actions taken in IC in the server for example if GSD were to try to recontain me theyd need more evidence and proof to do anything about it plus it would have to had been a very good reason which can lead to aggression and people being upset 2 with the new radio for 912 this may lead to arguing and problems as to whether he should or shouldnt have a radio]
[912 rules and possibly some of his equipment as 912 should be allowed access to gensec comms and radio for better communication in many circumstances and that he should be granted a cl1 keycard to open low level doors including D-block to assist for the rule change 912 should be able to refuse orders that are unreasonable or against what his orders intel ethically etc meaning you cant order him to beat d-class to death and no warning in airlock and that this means it'll be more better to improve RP so that things run more smoothly as for the rule suggestion 912 cant be re-contained without valid proof of what had happened for him to be recontained and shouldn't be re-contained if it is deemed necessary by ISD inspector+ or sergeant+ so that if something happens it is their call to recontain him or not and must provide evidence. ]
Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
[Maybe/possibly]
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
[ 1 This can improve RP and decision making in regards of gensec rp and other rp so that things run better 2 if given this rule and equipment this may mean that it can make things run smoother leading to quicker reaction being taken in regards of d-block RP and etc.]
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
[1 this can interfere with certain actions taken in IC in the server for example if GSD were to try to recontain me theyd need more evidence and proof to do anything about it plus it would have to had been a very good reason which can lead to aggression and people being upset 2 with the new radio for 912 this may lead to arguing and problems as to whether he should or shouldnt have a radio]