What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
This Suggestion would Allow Directors & COM's (and SC/SA) To be able to tell if their Direct JR CL4 roles are disguised. This would add a possible IC interaction where NU-7 / IA / INTEL Could bring someone suspected of being disguised through 914 to their disguises related department lead to confirm if they have hired this person or not. This would also incentivise disguised personnel to think about their next move more than just go around and killing high value targets on sight or going on a killing spree for the memes. This would not Touch Metagaming rules involving Disguise cards, Only people disguised through 914. I have written a list of who could Identify a disguised personnel.
- Overseer Council
Overseer Council Members
Overseer Assistants
Site Directors
No Lower
- Ethics Committee
Ethics Committee Members
Ethics Committee Assistants
Site Directors
No Lower
- Site Director
Site Directors
Site Advisors
Department Directors
Regimental Commanders
No Lower
- Department & Regimental Leads (Directors & Commanders may only identify people within their specified Department / Regiment)
Medical Director > Consultants
Research Director > Executive Researchers
Director of Internal Affairs > Internal Affairs Ambassadors
Director of Intelligence > Intelligence Ambassadors
General Security Chief > General Security Captains
E11 Commanders > E11 Lt. Commanders
NU7 Commanders > NU7 Lt. Commanders
B1 Commanders > B1 Lt. Commanders
O1 Commanders > O1 Lt. Commanders
A1 Commanders > A1 Lt. Commanders
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
- Could encourage more interactions With department Leadership outside of the role being Mostly OOC .
- Could cut down on People using 914 to minge around Disguised without a plan of escape / sabotage .
- Makes more Sense in RP For a Director/COM to know who they have interviewed & Hired instead of having to act clueless when a
random person disguised shows up.
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
- Would take time Getting used to new Game loop with disguised people interacting as their department/Regiment or avoiding the Lead of their disguised department/regiment.
- Could Void Effort of getting the right keycard to match disguise & Void the RP efforts they have done to Blend in.
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
I Believe this Should be accepted as it would incentivise D-Class & Non CI Deepcovers who have used 914 to RP More whilst disguised instead of using the disguise purley to get into a good position just to kill people for no Actual RP reason. as of right now i feel there are next to no rules for disguised hostiles as all i ever see are people with a 914 disguise going around and killing people or trying to get into HCZ just to release an attempt to breach SCP's Which can severely affect Passive RP.
This Suggestion would Allow Directors & COM's (and SC/SA) To be able to tell if their Direct JR CL4 roles are disguised. This would add a possible IC interaction where NU-7 / IA / INTEL Could bring someone suspected of being disguised through 914 to their disguises related department lead to confirm if they have hired this person or not. This would also incentivise disguised personnel to think about their next move more than just go around and killing high value targets on sight or going on a killing spree for the memes. This would not Touch Metagaming rules involving Disguise cards, Only people disguised through 914. I have written a list of who could Identify a disguised personnel.
- Overseer Council
Overseer Council Members
Overseer Assistants
Site Directors
No Lower
- Ethics Committee
Ethics Committee Members
Ethics Committee Assistants
Site Directors
No Lower
- Site Director
Site Directors
Site Advisors
Department Directors
Regimental Commanders
No Lower
- Department & Regimental Leads (Directors & Commanders may only identify people within their specified Department / Regiment)
Medical Director > Consultants
Research Director > Executive Researchers
Director of Internal Affairs > Internal Affairs Ambassadors
Director of Intelligence > Intelligence Ambassadors
General Security Chief > General Security Captains
E11 Commanders > E11 Lt. Commanders
NU7 Commanders > NU7 Lt. Commanders
B1 Commanders > B1 Lt. Commanders
O1 Commanders > O1 Lt. Commanders
A1 Commanders > A1 Lt. Commanders
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
- Could encourage more interactions With department Leadership outside of the role being Mostly OOC .
- Could cut down on People using 914 to minge around Disguised without a plan of escape / sabotage .
- Makes more Sense in RP For a Director/COM to know who they have interviewed & Hired instead of having to act clueless when a
random person disguised shows up.
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
- Would take time Getting used to new Game loop with disguised people interacting as their department/Regiment or avoiding the Lead of their disguised department/regiment.
- Could Void Effort of getting the right keycard to match disguise & Void the RP efforts they have done to Blend in.
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
I Believe this Should be accepted as it would incentivise D-Class & Non CI Deepcovers who have used 914 to RP More whilst disguised instead of using the disguise purley to get into a good position just to kill people for no Actual RP reason. as of right now i feel there are next to no rules for disguised hostiles as all i ever see are people with a 914 disguise going around and killing people or trying to get into HCZ just to release an attempt to breach SCP's Which can severely affect Passive RP.
Donator
