What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
If code restrictions can't stop it, make as many unique server-keybinds as possible configurable (e.g. so you don't need to press G specifically to perform X action)
Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
Yes, lots - this is an incredibly general suggestion that covers every possible similar suggestion
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
Accessibility for those with different controls
Further customisability for those who aren't directly affected by SWEPs
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
Dev time
Is this much effort really worth the gain?
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
Blanket suggestion, aside from dev time (and possible spaghetti code) I see no reason this shouldn't be done. Can always just be packaged in as a small change when X feature is reworked.
If code restrictions can't stop it, make as many unique server-keybinds as possible configurable (e.g. so you don't need to press G specifically to perform X action)
Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
Yes, lots - this is an incredibly general suggestion that covers every possible similar suggestion
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
Accessibility for those with different controls
Further customisability for those who aren't directly affected by SWEPs
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
Dev time
Is this much effort really worth the gain?
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
Blanket suggestion, aside from dev time (and possible spaghetti code) I see no reason this shouldn't be done. Can always just be packaged in as a small change when X feature is reworked.