PAC Request Al' John Kell

Tagging threads containing character bios which request approval for in-game PAC designs relating to the description of the character.
Status
Not open for further replies.

venomouscarnage

Well-known Member
Jan 27, 2026
14
1
41

Attachments

  • rp_site65_civilnetworks_10b0011.jpg
    rp_site65_civilnetworks_10b0011.jpg
    257.9 KB · Views: 22
  • rp_site65_civilnetworks_10b0012.jpg
    rp_site65_civilnetworks_10b0012.jpg
    260.2 KB · Views: 22
  • rp_site65_civilnetworks_10b0013.jpg
    rp_site65_civilnetworks_10b0013.jpg
    259.1 KB · Views: 19
  • rp_site65_civilnetworks_10b0014.jpg
    rp_site65_civilnetworks_10b0014.jpg
    270.4 KB · Views: 22
Last edited:
Good evening, @venomouscarnage

Your PAC3/Lore Request has been denied.

After serious consideration and back and forth with other staff, I've ultimately decided to deny this request and future iterations of this PAC for the following reasons: I don't believe that this PAC is of good quality enough to be used on the server. While the kinks have been worked out in regards to clipping and I appreciate you taking time out to write the lore document, the PAC itself and the lore behind it just don't make sense to be used here.

In regards to it's content, a bunny head and tail just don't feel right for the atmosphere we want to encourage on the server as a normal occurrence. Ideally only for special events or circumstances.

Realistically, he may be contained as soon as he gets affected by the SCP and putting that aside, why would they allow him to return to his duties as GenSec after such an experience? In regards to your lore, the SCP in question would result in a regular sized bunny and not a humanoid sized head with a tail popping out at the bottom, even if it were somehow stopped halfway it would not be that size- not to mention that the animal itself would have animal sentience. One more note on the lore, there was far too much redaction on mundane items including but not limited to the names of low level Foundation workers and the SCP itself and, while minor, there were many grammatical errors as well.

I do not wish to discourage you from submitting future PAC requests but please take more time to experience the server and it's atmosphere before resubmitting a new one to get a better idea of what we're going for.

Reviewed by
:
Senior Admins: Blob
Admins: Harold Hawks
Head Mods: Nixtl, Mirage, Rackarain

Kind regards,
Harold Hawks​
 
Status
Not open for further replies.