Denied Balancing Helis for both sides! :D

This suggestion has been denied and will not receive development.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Jun 16, 2022
39
8
91
What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
Oh boy here we go.
I will list all the changes i think should be made under the name of the heli

UAN Helis

Gunship
Its fine as it is

Kiowa
Its fine as it is

Viper
Remove the cannon and give it the same one as the caic
Make its hydras shoot faster since every single nwo heli except the Ka-50 shoots fast

Apache
Give it more engine power since all helis on nwo except the Ka-50 has good engine power

Commanche
When in the air its fine <3 just flips idk 35% of the time

Blackfoot
Fine just pls fix the hitting urself with hellfires part because it sucks loosing a Bf to something like that

Nwo


Eurocopter

Overall fine as it is very fun to fly
But fix the top roter dying when u scratch the skybox


Mi-24
Remove cannon

Add the same cannon as commanche or the apache

Caic
Fix the engine problem it sometimes has
But overall fun good heli


Ka-50
Give it more power its veeeeeeeery slow and hard to win against anything in it

Ka-52 oh boy
Remove the lockons because there is 0 reason a solo heli has lockons? And sure they are "hard to hit" but its still really odd
Remove cannon or give it the same cannon as kiowa because there is no reason why a solo heli has a better cannon than a Cas heli?

Mby give it a reskin so new players can see the difference between the 50 and 52

Blackfoot
Fine just pls fix the hitting urself with hellfires part because it sucks loosing a Bf to something like that


Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):

Heli balancing has been a bit goofy the last few months, and there has been alot of issues that people have tried to fix but no succes has been found.
These changes will hopefully make dogfights and bombing ground targets alot more fun and "fair"
I know some people will say "get good" and thats how it is.

But we have been waiting for a "balancing meeting" for weeks and it has not happens so this is my suggestion on what would be healthy for Heli regiments and for newer players.

I also believe that this helps with new pilots. Because some people go in a blackhawk fly it for 5 min and say fck it thats to steep of a learning curve. And i agree




Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:

Honestly i doubt this will get accpeted because for some reason heli balancing is a really touchy thing to talk about but i have my hopes!

I'd also like to stress, this is not to make Uan helis better and Nwo helis worse. I enjoy flying on both sides i just think there are some big issues that seem really easy to fix!
So Sl think about either make a meeting happen or talk about these things because they are a problem. And it scares new players away.

God bless and thank u for reading
 
Upvote 0
This suggestion has been closed. Votes are no longer accepted.

el zapso

Civil Gamers Expert
Donator
Sep 4, 2021
297
65
91
ill give my 2 cents here regarding the kiowa and the ka52,
Ive been in UAF and in SWB, the problems with them is theyre both retarded in their own way,
-ka52 cannon is good , the hydras are good but its a slow heli, so it can be picked on easily by a kwk and an AA, same with other helis
-Kiowa - useless minigun (which should be fixed) , slow and low ammount of hydras, handling is ok, but its unhitable, nothing can make it go down unless a stinger bops it or the cannon in helis (hence the ka52 cannon)

In conclusion, these 2 helis are both special in their own way

WHAT I WOULD DO: make the kiowa handling better and faster, make it so the ka52 has 4 lock ons
 
I think the issue is largely just the balance between the KA52 and Kiowa. The kiowa is unbearable to fly so needs handling + speed improvement. maybe hydra improvement but handling + speed would make it balanced as whle difficult to hit any cannon / hydra shot has a solid 95% of taking off its back rotor. disagree with these nerfs but would like to see kowa improved so neutral
 
Status
Not open for further replies.