Rule Suggestion Big Issue

[Houston Benton]

What does this suggestion change/add/remove:

Add a rule that forbids CI players from hopping on SCP's during a raid.
Or CI Requesting for SCP's to hop on during a raid with the intent to breach.

Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:

This hasn't been suggested previously

Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):

Less Long breaches that kill everything activity wise on the server
Less Coordinated-OP SCP's that ignore CI raiding parties

Possible Negatives of the suggestion:

None It forces CI to work with whatever SCP's that are onsite at that time rather than hopping on a combo-wombo of Type green's, astronaut, 079 that kill any semblance of roleplay

Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:

Would make SCP breaches that occur not last that thing as it'll be random players.
​

 

[Jack Raider]

once again, its already against the rules, call a sit instead of complaining on forums.

It's literally a clip related to the suggestion, I don't get your anger about it lmao

 

[Tigole]

That makes zero sense, in that case CI could get onto foundation then flag on SCP

Was about to make this argument. Realistically anyone can be good at an SCP

 

[Starling6]

the mald is crazy from both sides

+ soup,

millions must nerf ci

 

["Comet"/Shoobinshurt]

It's literally a clip related to the suggestion, I don't get your anger about it lmao

There's no anger, I'm saying why are you guys complaining on the forums about something thats already against the rules.

 

["Comet"/Shoobinshurt]

Was about to make this argument. Realistically anyone can be good at an SCP

Even if this becomes a rule then people can just get on foundation and then get on the SCP, there's no point in the suggestion.

 

[Sule Goodman]

This is quite literally already a rule, its usually just hard to find evidence of

 

["Comet"/Shoobinshurt]

This is quite literally already a rule, its usually just hard to find evidence of

If you feel an SCP is teaming make a sit and ask staff to spectate, don't need evidence.

 

[Evil]

 

["Aki"]

I sent it as a perfect example of how SCP played by CI react to ongoing CI raid elsewhere + from what I see this is not a complaint section, so 'thing that was handled' doesn't mean anything - if someone is warned for ERP does that mean they didn't ERP in the past, because it was handled? Slightly illogical thinking!

I don't think the example is perfect thought. it's not like you guys lead 076-2 into 079 and he ignores all the CI. no ofc he will just go in and kill everyone and there are also a few times where the 076-2 just straight up ignores the foundation who is trying to lead him into 079.

Legit same thing can be said for foundation mains that go out of their way to target CI gang, The clip you sent is a 076-2 Which is yes, a CI player but also someone who didn't know they can break 008 doors.

 

["Businessman"]

All I am going to say is this - you can surely guess what faction 076 player is from - yes the SCP that murders everyone on his escape path - unless they're chaos insurgency (new SCP canon????)

Untitled - Clipped with Medal.tv

24 Views - Watch Untitled by Jacek Daniels and millions of other Garry's Mod videos on Medal. Tags: Garry's Mod

medal.tv

He was actively trying to avoid going into 008's airlock. If he only wanted to avoid CI why would he let go off A-1 too? I have never seen CI ally with a SCP but i did see foundation ally with an SCP many times under the name "passive breach"