Bigger surface

Status
Not open for further replies.
Bloom

Bloom

Member
Jan 26, 2025
3
2
11
What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
[Response here] Add a larger map with locations for ci and the foundation to fight over.

Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
[Response here] Too many people feel confined to the small map on the surface and they want something new and exciting.

Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
[Response here] Cars and helicopters become useful and operations can be hosted for ex around the map. Ci and the foundation can claim locations (this creates more PvP and role play.)

Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
[Response here] Not really any negatives

Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
[Response here] More player count - also more excitement for the surface as a citizen, ci and foundation staff - Endless amounts of possibilities.
 
Last edited:
  • Love
Reactions: Blixer and Evil
Upvote 28 Downvote
fyzar

fyzar

Civil Gamers Expert
One Year Club Chemical Weaponry Conversation Starter Advent 2024
Feb 22, 2024
161
1
32
61
Kevin Ki said:
I do support this BUT, we have been told multiple times that it is not possible to expand surface when we have asked, this is due to source limitations. Now, I do not believe that is a limitation because we had seen massive maps in SWRP, and the like who have humongous maps made years ago
Click to expand...
doubt a couple displacements, lights and trees would tip the map over the limit and or affect fps by much

+support
 
Kevin Ki

Kevin Ki

Civil Gamers Expert
One Year Club Two Year Club Conversation Starter Chemical Weaponry
Dec 7, 2022
373
86
111
fyzar said:
doubt a couple displacements, lights and trees would tip the map over the limit and or affect fps by much

+support
Click to expand...
Nah it won't. If you do FProfiler in console and walk around a bit the main lag source is poorly made and compressed PAC3, and then the Vcomputers which we have WAY too many of around site (Medbay has 5-6, ethics has 7-8, Research has 6, etc), and then there's the latent checks constantly going from things like turrets, and of course the decorations every department lead ask for to "spice up" their bunks (which btw, give leadership roles advance dup to not have that shit there 24/7.
 
Nohacks

Nohacks

Civil Gamers Expert
One Year Club Two Year Club Advent 2024
Jul 21, 2022
91
11
111
The Guardian said:
- Support

The map in general is already getting too big. Surface doesn't need to be made bigger, Pinewood and PoI's needs to be reworked.

But also, they're not touching surface ever, so this'll get denied.
Click to expand...
Sadly u might be right but Nu-7, CI and GOC should be given a chance to show why it would improve surface is boring New areas and new cars or aircraft would improve RP and Fights i do think this would bring back active surface personal with helios and new stuff all surface groups could agree on this as we are bored on it 9-10 and surface missions take a long time and need rework to be fair!

I been around since Foundation didnt have a compound and just a little gate and nothing else surface has improve but i think we need RP on surface and CI, GOC, DEA and Nu-7 have talked about improving surface and events but we are left out a lot so i think this would bring more ci goc and SOP!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom