What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
This suggestion proposes increasing the clearance level required to access Combat Medic bunks from CL3 to CL4. This change tightens security protocols by limiting access to a highly sensitive area and ensures only authorized combat-oriented personnel can enter. It effectively removes general CL3 personnel, including non-combatives, from having routine access to the Combat Medic living quarters and connected armory spaces.
Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
After reviewing existing proposals, I was unable to locate a directly comparable suggestion. While some access-related changes have been discussed previously, none appear to specifically target the Combat Medic bunk area or involve a CL3-to-CL4 escalation. This suggestion is unique in its focus on operational readiness and emergency accessibility for Combat Medics.
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
Shifting access to CL4 for Combat Medic bunks is a strategic improvement to site safety, operational discipline, and role clarity. It safeguards critical resources (such as medical and combat equipment) from misappropriation or accidental interference and ensures Combat Medics are not hindered during high-pressure responses.
In doing so, it also reinforces proper Foundation protocol — preventing overreach from other departments and reducing the risk of conflicts or access violations. While it may introduce slight logistical detours for some, the broader benefit to combat readiness and site integrity makes this a valuable and necessary change.
This suggestion proposes increasing the clearance level required to access Combat Medic bunks from CL3 to CL4. This change tightens security protocols by limiting access to a highly sensitive area and ensures only authorized combat-oriented personnel can enter. It effectively removes general CL3 personnel, including non-combatives, from having routine access to the Combat Medic living quarters and connected armory spaces.
Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
After reviewing existing proposals, I was unable to locate a directly comparable suggestion. While some access-related changes have been discussed previously, none appear to specifically target the Combat Medic bunk area or involve a CL3-to-CL4 escalation. This suggestion is unique in its focus on operational readiness and emergency accessibility for Combat Medics.
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
- Improved Site Security: Restricting access ensures that D-Class personnel or any unauthorized individuals (e.g., researchers, technicians) cannot gain proximity to the Combat Medic armory or living spaces.
- Enhanced Emergency Responsiveness: Combat Medics will be able to enter and exit their bunks swiftly during emergencies without clearance delays or crowding caused by unrelated personnel.
- Policy Enforcement: Promotes stricter adherence to Foundation departmental boundaries discouraging casual or unauthorized entry into bunks.
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
- Inconvenience for Non-Medics: Staff who previously used the area as a shortcut or informal meeting point may now need to reroute through designated public or department-specific zones.
- Dependency on Nearby Armories: Site personnel seeking quick access to equipment may now have to rely solely on the Security Sector or Delta Armory, which could create minor delays in lower-risk scenarios
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
Shifting access to CL4 for Combat Medic bunks is a strategic improvement to site safety, operational discipline, and role clarity. It safeguards critical resources (such as medical and combat equipment) from misappropriation or accidental interference and ensures Combat Medics are not hindered during high-pressure responses.
In doing so, it also reinforces proper Foundation protocol — preventing overreach from other departments and reducing the risk of conflicts or access violations. While it may introduce slight logistical detours for some, the broader benefit to combat readiness and site integrity makes this a valuable and necessary change.
Last edited:
Senior Administrator
SCP-RP Staff
Event Team
Donator
Group Moderator
