What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
Hello, yes, This suggestion will change the rule regarding Codewords in Section 2, 2.10 Codewords & Keypad Codes - Codewords & Keypad codes may be created, modified and interrogated for. However, they may only be changed on Sundays after 8PM BST. Codewords must be disseminated through in-game methods, whether via documentation or direct interaction.
INTO
2.10 Codewords & Keypad Codes - Codewords & Keypad codes may be created, modified and interrogated for. However, they may only be changed on Sundays after 12PM (High Noon, after 11 AM) BST. Codewords must be disseminated through in-game methods, whether via documentation or direct interaction.
Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
Nope
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
Less strict on Rules and Players
Allows for more time for Regiment COs to change them incase they forget and or are phyiscally unable to
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
N/A?
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
It just eases restriction and makes stuff less strict.
Hello, yes, This suggestion will change the rule regarding Codewords in Section 2, 2.10 Codewords & Keypad Codes - Codewords & Keypad codes may be created, modified and interrogated for. However, they may only be changed on Sundays after 8PM BST. Codewords must be disseminated through in-game methods, whether via documentation or direct interaction.
INTO
2.10 Codewords & Keypad Codes - Codewords & Keypad codes may be created, modified and interrogated for. However, they may only be changed on Sundays after 12PM (High Noon, after 11 AM) BST. Codewords must be disseminated through in-game methods, whether via documentation or direct interaction.
Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
Nope
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
Less strict on Rules and Players
Allows for more time for Regiment COs to change them incase they forget and or are phyiscally unable to
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
N/A?
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
It just eases restriction and makes stuff less strict.
Donator
