What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
Add/combine both the laser and flashlight attachment into one and charge a fancy price for it (People will buy).
How it would work:
If you turn on the flashlight, the laser will turn off. If you turn off the flashlight, the laser will turn on.
Process diagram:
Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
There has been suggestions to modify the steep price of the two, but I don't believe anything combining them.
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
Not needing to switch to a less preferred weapon with each attachment. (Example: Rifle w/ laser & Pistol w/ flashlight)
Be tactically prepared for power outages while looking cool with the laser.
Little to no balancing issues.
Short dev time.
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
The bankruptcy of single feature attachment manufacturers.
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
I believe this should be accepted as it's been something wanted by the community, and wouldn't require any major development time. Small quality of life change that I know everyone will invest in without balancing issues.
Add/combine both the laser and flashlight attachment into one and charge a fancy price for it (People will buy).
How it would work:
If you turn on the flashlight, the laser will turn off. If you turn off the flashlight, the laser will turn on.
Process diagram:
Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
There has been suggestions to modify the steep price of the two, but I don't believe anything combining them.
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
Not needing to switch to a less preferred weapon with each attachment. (Example: Rifle w/ laser & Pistol w/ flashlight)
Be tactically prepared for power outages while looking cool with the laser.
Little to no balancing issues.
Short dev time.
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
The bankruptcy of single feature attachment manufacturers.
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
I believe this should be accepted as it's been something wanted by the community, and wouldn't require any major development time. Small quality of life change that I know everyone will invest in without balancing issues.