Denied D-block biometric cl3

[Knight]

What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
It would change the d-block biometric cl3 in the vents to a d-block cl3

Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
N/A

Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
One, Makes d-class getting out of d-block somewhat easier, I mean, It still leads to d-block like every other exit, 2nd, It makes hacking the fault easier for everyone.

Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
Slightly harder for gsd from the possible d-class that could flank

Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
Well, it would help d-class a bit without giving them a actual buff which would be a 3rd option d-class could actually go to where GSD wouldn't be sitting at 24/7

 

[DarkSoldier]

What are you playing USA or UK

 

[Knight]

What are you playing USA or UK

USA

 

[Niox]

+Support
-2nd exit is shit to get through, this might actually make it an option for escaping

 

[Yellow571]

That door is biometric for a pretty obvious reason. No prison would realistically make a cell block's secret backdoor accessible to anyone with a stolen keycard.
-Support

 

[Niox]

That door is biometric for a pretty obvious reason. No prison would realistically make a cell block's secret backdoor accessible to anyone with a stolen keycard.
-Support

"Realistically":
>SC wouldn't be on the same site as a Containment Site
>CI's bunker would be nuked into the ground
>ERT would be E-11
>Nu-7 would be broken and have Tanks/Heli's
>GSD would guard more than D-Block
>You wouldn't be able to just buy guns from a man in the back using scrap within D-Block

This site really is based on realism huh......

While we're at it, lets make every door a CL4 that is Biometric, but has override for the people who need it.
I mean, realistically we would want Site Security to be at its maximum, right?

 

[Chii]

Make it a CL2 biometric instead, because its realistic that it would be biometric locked. It needs to be hacked, not keycarded.

 

[Yellow571]

"Realistically":
>SC wouldn't be on the same site as a Containment Site
>CI's bunker would be nuked into the ground
>ERT would be E-11
>Nu-7 would be broken and have Tanks/Heli's
>GSD would guard more than D-Block
>You wouldn't be able to just buy guns from a man in the back using scrap within D-Block

This site really is based on realism huh......

While we're at it, lets make every door a CL4 that is Biometric, but has override for the people who need it.
I mean, realistically we would want Site Security to be at its maximum, right?

Oh for sure, since the server's already unrealistic might as well make it worse. Sounds about right.

 

[Niox]

Oh for sure, since the server's already unrealistic might as well make it worse. Sounds about right.

i'm saying your point is dogshit, and this is far from the worst thing ever in terms of realism, especially compared to literally everything else

 

[Arthur 'ISD']

+support make it better for d-class

 

[Zack Baker]

Make it a CL2 biometric instead, because its realistic that it would be biometric locked. It needs to be hacked, not keycarded.

CL2 biometric yes. it makes it cl3 to hack the keypad so it works

 

[DeceaseManz]

+Support
[I Agree With The CI]

 

[Aithaed]

Suggestion Denied

---

Hi Knight,

Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion.
The Content Team has chosen to deny your suggestion due to the following reasons.

It is intended to be difficult for D-Class to break through the upper Vent area door. Changing this would negatively impact the balance between D-Class and GSD.

Your suggestion will now be locked and marked as denied.​