What does this suggestion change/add/remove: It gives D-Class a Deep Cover job so they can get information for D-Class. They could disguise as a Researcher and try to escape with other D-Class or potentially leak documents inside D-Block for an infobreach. To not make this class too OP it would have to have its own ruleset applied to it by SL or whoever decides these things that way its not abused.
Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?: Not that I know of.
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
It adds more gameplay for D-Class.
It'll force Foundation to secure more checkpoints for intruders or force GenSec to properly guard D-Block and tests involving D-Class.
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
It might be too OP
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted: It'll add an entirely new way to play D-Class and a better gameplay experience for GenSec checking for Deep Covers.
Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?: Not that I know of.
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
It adds more gameplay for D-Class.
It'll force Foundation to secure more checkpoints for intruders or force GenSec to properly guard D-Block and tests involving D-Class.
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
It might be too OP
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted: It'll add an entirely new way to play D-Class and a better gameplay experience for GenSec checking for Deep Covers.
Trial Game Master
Community Sup.
Group Moderator