Denied DEA loadout change/Slight Addition

This suggestion has been denied and will not receive development.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Nov 3, 2023
84
17
61
What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
This suggestion changes the External Affairs Dpt. Manager's weapon from the ASVAL to the EBR.
This also gives Field Agent
CL4 override to most CL4 doors since it's part of the job to have the authority of a CL4.

Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
Not to my knowledge. However if something has been suggested before, the unique portion of this suggestion would be adding CL4 override to External Affairs Field Agent since the job was made before the override feature was added.

Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):

Department Manager Possitives:
The possitives of this suggestion would make EA Dpt. Manager more enticing to obtain and play. As it stands the only difference between Manager and Special Agent is that Manager has more responsibilities and can say "get to garage for raid". Because of this, not many people are willing to go for Manager unless they have friends already in the department to talk with. Manager is also just long overdue for a loadout change, ever since the DSR was removed from the job (sad day for DEA) it has had and kept the same kit as Special Agent. This would give the EBR a use again since it was replaced with the Virtus MCX for Alpha-1.

Field Agent Possitives:
Field Agent has had a CL3 for the longest time(since it was released). With the somewhat recent addition of keycard overrides, it would give Field Agent the ability to open/close some CL4 doors which they can't do at the moment even though they hold the authority and knowledge of a CL4 (It's in the job description for the players who aren't aware).

Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
I personnally believe that there are not many negatives to this suggestion since EA Field Agent is only recieving override to common CL4 doors/bulk heads and Manager should have its kit changed slightly so that there is uniqueness to the job. HOWEVER I do emplore anyone who sees a downside to this to express your opinion in the comments.

Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
Makes DEA more desirable to play and strive for higher ranks. Only recently had a small influex of people, however most are older DEA players who relapsed.
 

Sebastian

Game Master
Game Master
Sep 24, 2024
36
10
41
-Neutral

Trust me, you don't want this gun; the pullout time for it is horrible, and for a role that switches weapons a lot, it's just going to suck.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Niox

nooblet

Well-known Member
Aug 17, 2024
66
18
41
+support

- I don't see pull out time being an issue on surface, it's a combat area so you should have it out and off safety almost the entire time you're out there anyways. Rip EBR.
 

Plum

Well-known Member
Nov 3, 2024
31
16
41
+Support

I want to -support this cause you're trying to steal EBR, but VAL is really bad and DEA needs a decent weapon to fight GOIs. Also the pullout animation can just be fixed by Devs.
 

Prophet

Senior Moderator
Senior Moderator
SCP-RP Staff
Content Team
Aug 11, 2022
92
24
111
Suggestion Denied

Hi , Joseph Von Claus

Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion.
The Content Team has chosen to deny your suggestion due to the following reasons.

EBR would unbalance surface combat and the CL4 override would not be used very often so it would not be needed.

Your suggestion will now be locked and marked as denied.​
 
  • Like
Reactions: Emilia Foddg
Status
Not open for further replies.