Denied DEA Loadout change

This suggestion has been denied and will not receive development.
Status
Not open for further replies.
What does this suggestion change/add/remove:

- Add Door charges to special agent and manager
- Change the primary of special/manager agent from ASVAL to another weapon (AEK, L85A2, LR300)
- Add own team card to MANAGER only
- Add just elastic restraints to Field agent

Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:

A DEA loadout change has been sugggested before most likely, but not recently

Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):

- Dea able to deal with infobreaches when NU7 isnt on
- Special/managers are better able to do combat without relying on perma weapons
- Managers are able to use a disguise in order to find DEA breaking FLC
- Field agents are able to better take control of Civs if they break into foundation and to better help capture CI

Possible Negatives of the suggestion:

- DEA abusing door charges
- Takes away from Nu7
- Managers abusing Own team card

Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
Because DEA has slowly been falling behind other regiments with equipment and the nerf to the AS VAL months ago. DEA has not been changed to reflect those changes. Its unfair for DEA to be forced to use perma due to the low damage of the AS VAL, therefore it should be changed to reflect new surface update. The door charges help DEA in general and during low pop to help combat surface and infobreaches, all though it kind of does take away from Nu7 this isnt that big of a deal and if anything helps Nu7. Own team card for manager would be good and more in line with director, it would allow managers to catch DEA breaking rules and help in general on surface. Elastic restraints for field agent would help them to stop civs from walking into garage and mean that field agents could help capture civs in base as well as CI. In general the positives outweigh the negetives and DEA hasnt received a balancing for a while in which as let them fall behind other regiments. All of the negetives come down to abuse which can be solved through proper punishments from DEA leadership.
 
Last edited:

BlobbiMan

Well-known Member
Apr 5, 2024
19
2
41
-1.
Get Nu-7 to break doors for you.
ASVal is fine, just buy another gun from armory.
You arent supposed to be IA as a manager.
Buy elastics from a dispenser.
 
I just wanna add to all the minus support

- door charges are not nu7's whole idenitity and is crazy to think it would affect it this much
- IM NOT ASKING TO MERGE WITH NU7, this suggestion barely scratches the surface of what nu7 have and is exactly why DEA continues to be neglected
- Im MAINLY asking for Special/manager gun change due to the AS VAL being underpowered (someone legit proved my point)
- The other things are just bonuses if the content team wish to add them
 
I dont give + or - supports but as a ex DEA manager and current Nu-7 heres my opinion:
- door charges are not nu7's whole idenitity and is crazy to think it would affect it this much
DEA getting door charges would make no sense, and you're right its not the identity of Nu-7 but its the one thing that Nu-7 should keep personalized towards them. DEA have ID cards for spying, Nu-7 have door charges for raiding.

- Change the primary of special/manager agent from ASVAL to another weapon (AEK, L85A2, LR300)
i do agree the ASVAL needs a change, its a bit shit when compared to other guns that CL4's hold & GOC/CI.

- Add own team card to MANAGER only
Its really a IA thing, and non-combative thing.

- Add just elastic restraints to Field agent
They don't want Nu-7 or DEA to spawn with elastics i don't think, its been a suggestion many times.
 

Prplex

Senior Administrator
Senior Administrator
SCP-RP Staff
Content Team
Donator
Group Moderator
Dec 20, 2023
644
125
21
Suggestion Denied

Hi @"Mozzie" ,

Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion.
The Content Team has chosen to deny your suggestion due to the following reasons.

We believe these loudout changes aren't needed. They make the role both less unique and don't really bring anything to it.

Your suggestion will now be locked and marked as denied.​
 
Status
Not open for further replies.