What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
- Add Door charges to special agent and manager
- Change the primary of special/manager agent from ASVAL to another weapon (AEK, L85A2, LR300)
- Add own team card to MANAGER only
- Add just elastic restraints to Field agent
Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
A DEA loadout change has been sugggested before most likely, but not recently
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
- Dea able to deal with infobreaches when NU7 isnt on
- Special/managers are better able to do combat without relying on perma weapons
- Managers are able to use a disguise in order to find DEA breaking FLC
- Field agents are able to better take control of Civs if they break into foundation and to better help capture CI
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
- DEA abusing door charges
- Takes away from Nu7
- Managers abusing Own team card
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
Because DEA has slowly been falling behind other regiments with equipment and the nerf to the AS VAL months ago. DEA has not been changed to reflect those changes. Its unfair for DEA to be forced to use perma due to the low damage of the AS VAL, therefore it should be changed to reflect new surface update. The door charges help DEA in general and during low pop to help combat surface and infobreaches, all though it kind of does take away from Nu7 this isnt that big of a deal and if anything helps Nu7. Own team card for manager would be good and more in line with director, it would allow managers to catch DEA breaking rules and help in general on surface. Elastic restraints for field agent would help them to stop civs from walking into garage and mean that field agents could help capture civs in base as well as CI. In general the positives outweigh the negetives and DEA hasnt received a balancing for a while in which as let them fall behind other regiments. All of the negetives come down to abuse which can be solved through proper punishments from DEA leadership.
- Add Door charges to special agent and manager
- Change the primary of special/manager agent from ASVAL to another weapon (AEK, L85A2, LR300)
- Add own team card to MANAGER only
- Add just elastic restraints to Field agent
Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
A DEA loadout change has been sugggested before most likely, but not recently
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
- Dea able to deal with infobreaches when NU7 isnt on
- Special/managers are better able to do combat without relying on perma weapons
- Managers are able to use a disguise in order to find DEA breaking FLC
- Field agents are able to better take control of Civs if they break into foundation and to better help capture CI
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
- DEA abusing door charges
- Takes away from Nu7
- Managers abusing Own team card
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
Because DEA has slowly been falling behind other regiments with equipment and the nerf to the AS VAL months ago. DEA has not been changed to reflect those changes. Its unfair for DEA to be forced to use perma due to the low damage of the AS VAL, therefore it should be changed to reflect new surface update. The door charges help DEA in general and during low pop to help combat surface and infobreaches, all though it kind of does take away from Nu7 this isnt that big of a deal and if anything helps Nu7. Own team card for manager would be good and more in line with director, it would allow managers to catch DEA breaking rules and help in general on surface. Elastic restraints for field agent would help them to stop civs from walking into garage and mean that field agents could help capture civs in base as well as CI. In general the positives outweigh the negetives and DEA hasnt received a balancing for a while in which as let them fall behind other regiments. All of the negetives come down to abuse which can be solved through proper punishments from DEA leadership.
Last edited: