Denied ECA loadout addition

[Slipperman_1]

What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
It adds a tranquilizer to ECA's load out.

Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
ECA's will be able to stop people from escaping without a need to put them under fear RP. It will also help against people who are using potent duloxetine for example because they run away from before you can tell them to stop moving.

Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
ECAs will have too many weapons on them. Their load out will be too similar to IA Ambassadors

Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
It makes sence that ethics assistants goal is not to terminate but to arrest somebody.

 

[Naffen]

-support ECAs aren't IA. Not sure why they'd be chasing down fleeing suspects when that isn't their job. They have O1 and IA to do that. Hell even RRT can do it for you

 

["Arachnid"]

+/- Support
Sounds like that would have them engaging in combat as a non combatant
If the ECA members can be trusted sure why not

 

[Michael Dzhetnikov]

-Support
Thats not your job

 

[Dinklesprinkle]

-support ECAs aren't IA. Not sure why they'd be chasing down fleeing suspects when that isn't their job. They have O1 and IA to do that. Hell even RRT can do it for you

and even if they were remotely anything like IA look how long it took for staff to agree for IA leadership alone to get it lmao

 

[ERaven]

- Support​

ECAs dont need tranqs. If there is someone that needs stopping we have O-1. The argument about potent is not something I have had an issue with and if you really need to put someone under fearrp use a rifle whilst having a combative disguse.

 

[Joe "Enoch"]

+/- Support

We are not IA but us ECAs still deal with people who do break the CoE and we do have to punish them and 9/10 times they run away and break fear RP and admins wont do anything if they run and we cant call a AOS or thats meta game and if we kill them we cant punish them because thats NLR so we just cant do anything when it comes to arresting someone.

 

[Free "Spirit"]

What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
It adds a tranquilizer to ECA's load out.

massive -SUPPORT

 

[MazuzaM]

- Support
ECA Is literally non combative, it's failrp for them to engage in a combat/arrest scenario like that lmfao

 

[Rushi]

Suggestion Denied

---

Hi @Slipperman_1,

Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion.

The Content Team has chosen to deny your suggestion because ECA's do require a tranquilizer as it would make them chase after people to arrest them, which is not their job. If they require someone to be detained, there is MTF O-1, Internal Affairs and many other jobs that can help them with that.

Your suggestion will now be locked and marked as denied.​