Denied ERT SURFACE LOADOUT

[John Ion Wells]

What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
Add an ERT loadout for when scps reach surface.

Here are some ideas the ert can have in this loadout.
-barret 50.
-freedom sr/sactum
-breach charges
-360 turret(like normal turret but can go 360)
-matador(for hostile lavs and btr)
-auger minigun
-nitro
-ETD hacking tool(for when you need to hack into ci to rc the scp)
-orbital strike???
note: because we dont want more ert we can have the same number people but with 4 loadout in all teams

Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
not of that i know of

Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
-easier rc on surface
-fast and more recovery to normal rp on surface
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
-harder for ci & mcd to get their hands on scps
-maybe less rp matrieal for parawatch
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
because ert is only suited for in site rcing and not outside rc so it is a bit of an bomb

 

[Michael Dzhetnikov]

ERT have no problem dealing with SCPs on surface

 

[John Ion Wells]

ERT have no problem dealing with SCPs on surface

they do
they only have short-medium range weapons, with ci on surface as well, and the fact that turrets and the sheild are not fitted for open spaces it is an problem

 

[Evil]

-support
ya no i don't feel like getting sanctum

 

[Mr Apple]

-breach charges
-360 turret(like normal turret but can go 360)
-matador(for hostile lavs and btr)
-auger minigun
-nitro
-ETD hacking tool(for when you need to hack into ci to rc the scp)

+Support

-barret 50.

+Support

-freedom sr/sactum

-Support

-orbital strike???

-Support

 

[John Ion Wells]

-support
ya no i don't feel like getting sanctum

you dont need to get sactum but it was an idea but i beilve that an barret is good for an main gun

 

[Caboose.]

+/- sup

 

[Joris Kilotoviz/London]

Regular turrets are already brutal on Surface

 

[Niox]

Here are some ideas the ert can have in this loadout.
-barret 50.

sounds silly

Here are some ideas the ert can have in this loadout.
-freedom sr/sactum

please dont give them energy weapons on spawn i beg

Here are some ideas the ert can have in this loadout.
-breach charges

idc sure

Here are some ideas the ert can have in this loadout.
-360 turret(like normal turret but can go 360)

sounds busted

Here are some ideas the ert can have in this loadout.
-matador(for hostile lavs and btr)

or you can just get one from AA, or cooperate with other DPT's
If ERT spawned with a matador, there will be at least 1 person who will use it on a SCP.

Here are some ideas the ert can have in this loadout.
-nitro

lol

Here are some ideas the ert can have in this loadout.
-ETD hacking tool(for when you need to hack into ci to rc the scp)

use dispensers

Here are some ideas the ert can have in this loadout.
-orbital strike???

this is the funniest shit ive seen all day
-Support

 

[John Ion Wells]

Regular turrets are already brutal on Surface

they can only face one way plus they can just run around and it stops shooting like it is an diffrent story if it on an opening of an building like pd but in like no mans land it is like useless

 

[John Ion Wells]

sounds busted

maybe but we can as well add an range to it as well if it is too good

use dispensers

the idea is that ert can just go directly to rc the scps

or you can just get one from AA, or cooperate with other DPT's
If ERT spawned with a matador, there will be at least 1 person who will use it on a SCP

same as above plus if that was the case, why cant ert just spawn with no aa and then go to aa to get aa?
ert is as well mainly cl3 combative so them using it on scps is their fault for not knowing the rules

 

[Niox]

the idea is that ert can just go directly to rc the scps

are CI SCP's? Its a incredibly niche change.

same as above plus if that was the case, why cant ert just spawn with no aa and then go to aa to get aa?

Because their job is to kill SCP's, not to kill CI for a very niche situation where there are A) SCP's on surface, B) CI on surface with C) A vehicle out.

ert is as well mainly cl3 combative so them using it on scps is their fault for not knowing the rules

ok

 

[John Ion Wells]

are CI SCP's? Its a incredibly niche change.

no but ert will not stop if ci has them

Because their job is to kill SCP's, not to kill CI for a very niche situation where there are A) SCP's on surface, B) CI on surface with C) A vehicle out.

A is common if ert is called B is always common and 100% if scps are on surface C Which is alot if there are scps on surface

 

[Joris Kilotoviz/London]

they can only face one way plus they can just run around and it stops shooting like it is an diffrent story if it on an opening of an building like pd but in like no mans land it is like useless

Well yeah, they are meant to have counters

 

[Mozzie]

-support for everything expect TE5

Ert is already insanely strong and do not need energy weapons or better weapons in general in the current state

 

[John Ion Wells]

Well yeah, they are meant to have counters

yea of course but not a to counter fuck up an entire rc of an mass surface breach

 

[John Ion Wells]

-support for everything expect TE5

Ert is already insanely strong and do not need energy weapons or better weapons in general in the current state

not stronger but focused in another field like surface

 

[Change Z. "Somebody"]

Suggestion Denied

---

Hi John Ion Wells,

Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion.
The Content Team has chosen to deny your suggestion due to the following reasons.

Your suggestion has been denied because ERT is perfectly fine with the loadouts that it has currently and we believe that it is amply equipped to deal with SCPs who have breached on to surface.

Your suggestion will now be locked and marked as denied.​