What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
Key:
1 ERT Team = 3 ERT Players
1 ERT Wave = 9 ERT Players
In order for Foundation Emergency Response Teams to be deployed to contain a breach, a Warfund price should be applied in the following ways:
(0-60 Server Pop): Free of cost
(60-100 Server Pop): 350,000 Warfunds Per Team / 1.05 Million Warfunds Per Wave
(100-128 Server Pop): 500,000 Warfunds Per Team / 1.5 Million Warfunds Per Wave
Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
N/A
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
+ Balances out gameplay for SCP breaches (ERT teams aren't spammed with 0 consequences, SCPs have more chances)
+ Encourages Warfund usage for Foundation (More variety of Warfund usage + Balances out the Warfund economy)
+ More reasons for ERT players to value their lives, utilize tactics and collaborate with standard MTF teams to contain threats
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
- Foundation must pay for ERT (Costs alot if they overrespond)
- If Foundation run out of Warfunds they will be unable to call in ERT
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
All in all, this creates a general positive for the Warfund economy. After returning to this server for quite a little bit, I've noticed that Foundation regularly just deploys only vehicles and immediately utilize their Warfunds for their weapon buffs against SCPs just because they can and that they have the money to do so. This can be balanced around to improve QoL if situations do get out of hand consistently.
Key:
1 ERT Team = 3 ERT Players
1 ERT Wave = 9 ERT Players
In order for Foundation Emergency Response Teams to be deployed to contain a breach, a Warfund price should be applied in the following ways:
(0-60 Server Pop): Free of cost
(60-100 Server Pop): 350,000 Warfunds Per Team / 1.05 Million Warfunds Per Wave
(100-128 Server Pop): 500,000 Warfunds Per Team / 1.5 Million Warfunds Per Wave
Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
N/A
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
+ Balances out gameplay for SCP breaches (ERT teams aren't spammed with 0 consequences, SCPs have more chances)
+ Encourages Warfund usage for Foundation (More variety of Warfund usage + Balances out the Warfund economy)
+ More reasons for ERT players to value their lives, utilize tactics and collaborate with standard MTF teams to contain threats
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
- Foundation must pay for ERT (Costs alot if they overrespond)
- If Foundation run out of Warfunds they will be unable to call in ERT
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
All in all, this creates a general positive for the Warfund economy. After returning to this server for quite a little bit, I've noticed that Foundation regularly just deploys only vehicles and immediately utilize their Warfunds for their weapon buffs against SCPs just because they can and that they have the money to do so. This can be balanced around to improve QoL if situations do get out of hand consistently.
Content Team
Donator