What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
This suggestion is specifically targeted at foundation warfund hacking. Instead of having the same hacking location at SA offices over and over again what I am suggesting is instead having a slightly dynamic implementation.
What this would entail is a senior admin+ can set up like 3/4 possible locations for the terminal to be active, and every restart or manually every week the location of the active warfund hacking terminal is changed. There would be a visual indicator added to the active terminal so it can be successfully found by raiding parties/ deepcovers.
Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
Not a clue, didn't find anything
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
- Stops constant warfund hacking being focused solely on SA offices
- Adds more goals for deep covers that isn't combat focused
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
- People might not like finding the new location I guess
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
This suggestion should be accepted so there is more planning needed before CI can do a hacking raid and it adds variety to the holds and pushes so it isn't just the same constant shite SA office pushes/holds.
This suggestion is specifically targeted at foundation warfund hacking. Instead of having the same hacking location at SA offices over and over again what I am suggesting is instead having a slightly dynamic implementation.
What this would entail is a senior admin+ can set up like 3/4 possible locations for the terminal to be active, and every restart or manually every week the location of the active warfund hacking terminal is changed. There would be a visual indicator added to the active terminal so it can be successfully found by raiding parties/ deepcovers.
Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
Not a clue, didn't find anything
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
- Stops constant warfund hacking being focused solely on SA offices
- Adds more goals for deep covers that isn't combat focused
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
- People might not like finding the new location I guess
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
This suggestion should be accepted so there is more planning needed before CI can do a hacking raid and it adds variety to the holds and pushes so it isn't just the same constant shite SA office pushes/holds.
Programming Team
Junior Developer
Donator