What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
The rule addition is that you must have a proper reason to leak frequencies like the GSD, medical, ISD, or otherwise. This can be being forcibly interrogated, viably threatened, or otherwise.
Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
Don't believe so. If I am wrong, please inform me.
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
Might create confusion and needing to read logs if someone has been given a reason to leak a frequency by interrogation, threats, or otherwise - but has been reported as otherwise. Might create further staff oversight for radio'd roles.
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
This suggestion ought to be accepted as it formalises an already job-bannable offense into a clear, enforceable rule without restricting, meaningfully, legitimate roleplay. Frequency leaking, in it's current implementation, is often abused out-of-character with little consequence - forcing core departments like GSD and medical to absorb the disruption while waiting on radio-change cooldown.
The rule addition is that you must have a proper reason to leak frequencies like the GSD, medical, ISD, or otherwise. This can be being forcibly interrogated, viably threatened, or otherwise.
Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
Don't believe so. If I am wrong, please inform me.
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
- Prevention of minges constantly leaking frequencies like GSD, ISD, or medical by logging onto the role and provisioning it to people with no intention to roleplay.
- Adds a rule to start viably enforcing against people with no intention to roleplay, instead of GSD, medical, and ISD having to wait a cooldown while the individuals do it again.
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
Might create confusion and needing to read logs if someone has been given a reason to leak a frequency by interrogation, threats, or otherwise - but has been reported as otherwise. Might create further staff oversight for radio'd roles.
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
This suggestion ought to be accepted as it formalises an already job-bannable offense into a clear, enforceable rule without restricting, meaningfully, legitimate roleplay. Frequency leaking, in it's current implementation, is often abused out-of-character with little consequence - forcing core departments like GSD and medical to absorb the disruption while waiting on radio-change cooldown.
Donator
