Denied Give MC&D Scranton Reality Anchors

This suggestion has been denied and will not receive development.
Status
Not open for further replies.
What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
It gives MC&D a Scranton Reality Anchor on spawn as apart of their default loadout

Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
Don't believe so.

Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
MC&D have a easier time killing Reality Benders/SCP's (There shouldn't be a spam issue as there is a cooldown in place for placing Anchors).
Someone can finally fix these stupid reality distortions on surface. (see below)1710631728475.png
GOI's could find more use cooperating with MC&D which would result in more RP creation.

Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
Balancing
MC&D might use it to counter CI TB's/GOC Thaum's on surface.

Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
Really just a convenience thing. No one fixes the reality distortions on surface, so might as well have MC&D be the ones to be fixing it (With some other upsides)
 

KalebStar

Civil Gamers Expert
Aug 10, 2023
56
6
61
Whenever they can. They just don’t do it well because they lack the equipment


POV: MC&D sells Scranton reality anchors to CI and GOC (they have 25 people total) and the reality bender can’t do shit
this is the sernario I’m thinking of
Reality benders when they get countered by the thing designed to counter reality benders
 
Don't see how it would. Guess MC&D could sell them to civies but at that point it just gives GOC a job to do on surface since paratech and alla that and selling to anyone else is just meh since they could just dispense them. Worst case scenario MC&D farm xp on surface but like it costs money and there's a pretty long cooldown for it.
Tbh I don't like using reality anchors against distortions as they just mean you have limited abilities against reality benders for around 7 minutes
 
  • Like
Reactions: Niox
Jul 10, 2023
212
68
61
Suggestion Denied

Hi @Niox ,

Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion.
The Content Team has chosen to deny your suggestion due to the following reasons.

This would be used mostly used combatively which is not needed in a non-combative role.

Your suggestion will now be locked and marked as denied.​
 
  • Sad
Reactions: Niox
Status
Not open for further replies.