Denied Give Site Administration Disguise Cards

[Asp]

What does this suggestion change/add/remove:

• Adds the Disguise Own team Card for all Site Administration Jobs (Site Director, Site Manager & Site Advisor)

Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):

• Improves safety of Site Administration.
• Allows Site Administration to go undercover.

Possible Negatives of the suggestion:

• ID Cards being used too frequently.
• Time dedicated to suggested changes.

Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
This suggestion should be accepted, because Disguise cards would be a very helpful tool at Site Administrations Disposal. A Disguise Card would allow Site Administration to go undercover, and see what is actually happening when there is no authority figure present, the same way Internal Affairs uses their Disguise Card. As Well as the fact that site administration would be safer with a Disguise Card, It would allow them to take a disguise during a Code 1, likely preventing their capture if they were to run into a Hostile GOI. However, with positives there is always a negative, if Site Administration did obtain Disguise Cards, there is always the possibility of people using the card too often, which would make Site Administration seem as if they are not involved with what is happening around the site, but, considering the responsibility given with the Site Administration title, they should be trusted enough to have a Disguise Card.

 

[Pyro]

+Massive Support

 

[moonyguru]

+support

 

[Evil]

-support
In my opinion Site administration do not need to have the ability to disguise as someone because of 3 reason

1. About 4 branches have this disguise making it unfair if site administration have disguise kits too.

2. it would not make sense for site administration to have a disguise kit as their job is to either oversee, document or advise, not go undercover or help with a Code 1, 2 or 5, that is IA and MTF job.

3. I feel this would actually in danger the site administration more then keep them safe as they will in the future become too cocky and will either get shank by d class or capture by CI even if disguise.

Good idea but would be unbalance

 

[Naffen]

-support, they don't need a disguise card. SA don't need to go "undercover" as that's not anywhere near the responsibilities of their job.
Safety wise they have multiple units at disposable to be able to guard them.

 

[Second]

+Support
Assistants have Disguise Cards, I see no reason why Site Admin wouldn't either.

 

[Haji]

-Support
And remove it from OA/ECA too. It is lethargic that you would be a job that gets an escort and still feel the need to go undercover. I killed Caboose 2x in a DC raid and he was laughing his ass off. It makes no sense for you to be undercover. If you want to roam, just ask:

- E-11 GRD
- RRT
- GenSec Officer/Sergeant
- A-1 (If appropriate)
- O-1 (If appropriate)
- IA IL
- Intel
- B-1 (If appropriate)

There are so many groups that can dedicate themselves to protect Side Administration, Ethics and Overwatch, yet people feel the need to disguise themselves. You're NOT important. Anyone other than departments/regiments that deal in undercover operations and the O5 shouldn't have abilities to go undercover simply because, in lore (since you individuals love some immersion), anyone that isn't the O5 is known to be expendable in the end. Sure, Site Administrators, Ethics members and so on are quite important since they are CL4/5, but really only the O5 actually matters.

 

[Snow]

-support

add disguise cards to chefs -_-

 

[Chad]

+support ong cuh

 

[SamPaval]

-/+ Neutral leaning -

Site administrators dont need to go undercover that's why they have IA to do the dirty work of seeing if people are bad.

I'll label this in pros and cons.

Pros

They won't get kidnapped anymore.
Can have a more hands on approach to seeing if people are bad.

Cons

4 branches with disguise kits already
Takes away from IA

SA has no need to go undercover unless CI is specifically targeting them in which then can get escorts by AA (archangels) from the MTF groups.

SA is a leading figure in the site and roams around with authority not stealth

You don't hide in the shadows like Internal will do.

 

[RedBubble55]

-Support

Site admin are the main face of each site, they wouldn't aim to hide and if they wanted to investigate something they'd report it to Site Command who have disguise cards.

Site admin would not benefit considerably and would take away from them being the public face around the site.

Thank you,

-Red

 

[Broda]

- Support

As a Site Director (Twice over) this has no purpose for Site Administration at all. We are the public facing side of the Site and have zero reason to disguise up.

 

[Vollgas]

-Support
IA exists for a reason, use them. You don't need to micromanage every situation, that's what the hierarchy is for.

 

[MazuzaM]

Site Admin will never have disguise cards

 

[Bill Nye The Guy]

-support they have no need to

 

[L.Saint]

Suggestion Denied​

---

Hi @Penumbra,

Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion. This was deemed as not necessary as Site Administration should utilise other jobs and departments to gather information as well as for security.

Your suggestion will now be locked and marked as denied.​