Rule Suggestion Give The Beret Back On TS To MTF MAJ's

[Blixer]

What does this suggestion change/add/remove:

[This gives the beret on Teamspeak back to the person with the rank of MAJ-COM, recently all the berets on Teamspeak have been wiped as they are not allowed. although this has been the case for about a year now? This didn't make any sense because Majors are literally part of REGIMENTAL COMMAND. So we cannot drag certain people to channels like other Majors that want to be moved by you to a certain channel, but no we would have to ask someone else??]

Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:

[no]

Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):

-Easier communication
-An easier way to manage people in the appropriate Teamspeak Channels
- People will not have to constantly ask to be moved to other channels by one person
- The appropriate rank (MTFCOM-BERET) is given to (REGIMENTAL COMMAND) MAJ of the Mobile Task Force member
-(This was literally a thing for a year??)


Possible Negatives of the suggestion:

[People who abuse, but this is probably getting enforced because of recent events, however, everyone should not suffer the consequences of certain people abusing their roles as they shouldn't be in the role in the first place if they are a power-hungry person, this applies to MTF, SA, SC.]

Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:

[It makes sense to have a REGIMENTAL COMMAND member to have a beret as they are a member of the COMMAND team and this has been ok for about a year and shouldn't be just enforced out of nowhere.]

 

["Winter"]

+Support

 

[auburn wick gramme]

+support ci delcom+ (equiv to LT) get their own beret btw

 

[Niox]

+Support
-i trust MAJ's+ with it

+support ci delcom+ (equiv to LT) get their own beret btw

the reason they have it is so they can drag people into Comms C and Commanders office, since they're passworded channels (Same goes with UNGOC LT getting the GOC Commander role)

 

[Starling6]

Internal policies my beloved (contact your leadership)

 

[Naffen]

You don't need the "MTF Commander" Tag (the beret one) to do all the things you're talking about, you can get the "Commisioned Officer" tag for that TS Channel as a Channel Group instead of a Server Group. MTF LTCOM and COM are the only ones that are meant to have the MTF Commander tags, because they are Commanders, Major is not.

 

[Dr Random K.]

All the other senior positions get it too, would make sense to give it back to majors

 

[Solaz]

-support,

you do not need it, just have a commissioned officer tag.

 

[Mars]

+support

 

[Tyrone]

+Support

 

[Jeffrey Nut]

I have been no MAJ before



but



+Support : D

 

["Apollo"]

+Support

 

[Grong]

Commissioned Officer tag?

 

[Bohemia]

+ Support
my face when SL ignore the fact every single CI officer has it

 

[Mars]

almost as if the CI commanders office and CI office on TS have passwords!

so give them the passwords lol

 

[Bohemia]

almost as if the CI commanders office and CI office on TS have passwords!

maybe remove the password on CI-C comms..... hard to imagine I know....

 

[Gure]

hat is wonderful

 

[Gure]

+support

 

[Skyfire1355]

Just want to address that Majors are not Regimental Command. They are the lead of Commissioned Officers but do not command the regiment. Regimental Command refers to the Commander and Lieutenant Commander.

 

[Pyro]

cool icon ig