Denied Giving IA more keycards

This suggestion has been denied and will not receive development.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Jacob Hamsworth

Jacob Hamsworth

Civil Gamers Expert
One Year Club Conversation Starter
Feb 22, 2024
526
85
61
What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
[basically giving IA agent all the keycards below their clearence, so an ambassador will have CL1,2,3 and 4, agent CL1,2,3 and so on so on]

Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
[not that I've seen]

Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
[allowing agent to blend in while disguised and making observations much more efficient ]

Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
[none that I can see]

Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
[Response here]
 
Upvote -2 Downvote
I get why you'd suggest this but 90% of the time if a IA agent pulls up with a lower clearance keycard during an ID check they getting arrested or shot. And even while disguised the keycards would say the original name and job title.
 
KalebStar said:
I get why you'd suggest this but 90% of the time if a IA agent pulls up with a lower clearance keycard during an ID check they getting arrested or shot. And even while disguised the keycards would say the original name and job title.
Click to expand...
I get it, but the name is much harder to read then looking at the color, if you see a chef with a cl3 its pretty obvious that he's IA
 

-Support​

1: That is the shortest format I’ve ever seen and you left the last thing as [response here]
2: Do you really wanna scroll thru 4 new keycards every time you access inventory?
3: If IA had those it would still say “agent” negating the point of the cards in the first place.
So I’ll said it again,

-Support​

 
Cheesy said:

-Support​

1: That is the shortest format I’ve ever seen and you left the last thing as [response here]
2: Do you really wanna scroll thru 4 new keycards every time you access inventory?
3: If IA had those it would still say “agent” negating the point of the cards in the first place.
So I’ll said it again,

-Support​

Click to expand...
the format has no really other stuff to add
yes
and the text is just super hard to read
 
I have previously made a more fleshed out suggestion with a better way of doing the same sort of thing that was partially accepted (though CT being CT, they didn't say which parts were accepted or denied, so idk if this part was)

Accepted - Own-Team Disguise Card Changes

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: This is basically two separate suggestions about the own-team disguise card. I'd do them separately, but they'd be guaranteed to be rejected if I did that because one is pointless without the other and one would cause issues without the other. First...
www.civilgamers.com www.civilgamers.com
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back