Denied GOC Roster Change

[Dusk]

What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
Add 3 more slots for Strike team and Assessment Team

Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
There are two separate teams plus more in the future perhaps and having only 3 hinders the actual roleplay element of having two teams for each group.

Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
Nothing besides having more Strike Team and Assessment Team members on, they don't bring anything special to the table other than having items from dispensers on spawn.

Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
There are two teams for Assessment and Strike. Having three slots for each means only a 2:1 ration can happen between both parties. Both squads do different tasks therefore both squads would need to be on at any given time to meet standards. Most the behind the scenes changes can happen at the GOC to regulate this however a need for more slots has been discussed to further the RP elements within US GOC.

 

[Second]

+/- Neutral Support

Honestly, this would be a good idea if Field Operative didn't exist in its current state. Since Field Op can kind of "Double Dip" as Strike Team with a solid weapon and Assessment Team with good tactical capabilities I see no need to up the limit.

 

[Dusk]

+/- Neutral Support

Honestly, this would be a good idea if Field Operative didn't exist in its current state. Since Field Op can kind of "Double Dip" as Strike Team with a solid weapon and Assessment Team with good tactical capabilities I see no need to up the limit.

To make a point towards this. Most of the roles in GOC should but based on player count aren't, monitored for RP reasons. Not to mention most the roles make no sense towards teambuilding. Soldier should be the priority role people flag on, with field operative being some form of step up, everything else beyond that belongs to a regiment within GOC in some form however because there isn't any official structure at the moment people just play what they want. This point however is being brought up and discussed within high command in GOC.

I still believe we need more slots for Strike and Assessment because of the teams that can be built within it, not to mention they should only be flagged onto when you actually belong to a strike or assessment team otherwise it makes no sense to RP as one if you don't belong to one.

My personal opinion is, Recruit should be unwhitelisted, Assessment and Strike need to be SGT and Field operative needs to be at least CPL so that teambuilding and recruitment should be about in-game knowledge and skill instead of who does what the most and who's on the most.

 

[Michael Dzhetnikov]

add more dc slots to ci then

 

[Dusk]

At the minimum 3 more slots for strike team to accommodate different strike teams and to accommodate chain of command within teams so CO's and Leads don't have to run everything themselves.

 

[verybobby]

Suggestion Denied

---

Hi @Kore,

Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion. GOC is not meant to be a combat oriented group, and in it's current state we don't believe adding more combative jobs would be beneficial to server health.

Your suggestion will now be locked and marked as denied.​