Harvey Bridger SA Application UK

Status
Not open for further replies.
Jan 20, 2024
258
58
41
Steam ID: STEAM_0:1:808706279

Discord name: lil_pat.

For how long have you played on CG SCP: 8 months

Age: 15

In what country are you located?: England

Time zone: BST

Character name(s):

Harvey Bridger

Gerald Partino

Raymond Fisher

Civilian name:

Raymond Fisher

What server are you applying for? (SCP-RP UK or SCP-RP USA): UK

Do you have a mic?: YES

List all whitelisted, MTF, or CI roles that you hold or have held:

MTF E-11 LT [Holding]

GSD SGT [Holding]

IA Agent [Holding]

Combat medic [Holding]

CI-B [Holding]


IA Ambassador [Held]

Have you received any kicks/bans/warning? and why?:

Screenshot (51).png
Why are you applying for Site Advisor?

I feel that it is time for me to attempt to elevate to a more senior position in this case Site Advisor. I have been in E-11 for Over 4 months and before that another two months in IA as an Ambassador and from this I have been in the state of mind of someone who is heavily combative based on roleplay experience (E-11) but also one with a heavily passive-based roleplay experience (IA Agent & Ambassador) I also believe that from my time in IA, I have gained an understanding of the FLC which is suitable for a member of Site Administration. overall I am applying as this position would allow me to use my set of skills which I have learned on the way with the help of the members of this community to give back to me through being a Site Advisor.

What makes you suitable for Site Administration?:

I have held positions that are both diverse in their own way. IA ambassadors which was a situation where I was leading Agents and making sure that the FLC was being enforced properly and that it was being done appropriately and suitably depending on the circumstances. Through E-11, where I am currently and LT I would be normally dealing with stress and under circumstances in which I need to be able to think fast on my feet in situations such as breaches of SCPs possibly reacting to CIs' presence in HCZ etc. which are also qualities of a Site Advisor as they need to be able to Decide what to do under pressure in even more situations from a Logistical point of view which is somewhat detached but still crucial.

Recently I have been working on GSD as an SGT, which has allowed me to further work on being in charge and having to control personnel in an area and lead things such as C2 sweeps which have the fundamentals that I would say are required for SA such as being able to think on the spot and adapt your plan based on the set of events which have occurred to have the best possible outcome occurs but also being able to communicate and relay information towards to people involved but also those that are not involved, so that transparency is happening in some situations you might have to be transparent to a specific extent as it might be better to leave it there.

What are the responsibilities of Site Administration in RP?:

Audits of Departements-
Recording how a department has done over the last month and seeing how their overall presence on the site has been and whether or not there have been any major issues such as tribunals unions etc. and recording that in a more metric way which also shows where they can improve and what the steps to being able to do so are.

Maintaining policies- Making sure that policies are up to date and that they do not contradict other policies but also that they are straight and simple to allow for no misunderstandings to occur.

Appointing people such as DPT Directors, NU7 Com & E-11 Com (unless they are appointed by EC or The 05 Council)

Delegating with other GOIs-
Making sure that relations with other groups of interest are stable and that there are no major issues that might cause issues in the future.

Authorizing AA- When needed in situations where there are 2 SCPS keter+ breached in most situations or unless it is Authorizing the use of matadors which are for Armoured vehicles, not SCPs.

Authorizing Test- Authorizing tests when they require SA to sign off on them

Authorizing of passive breaches- Under the condition that they have a BM of Less than 10% and that they have an E-11 Escort.

Authorizing side-wide lockdowns- In situations such as CI having flowers, exfilling the site, and possibly breaches.
Please give some lore about your Site Administration character and what storylines they would be involved in:

SECURENET Terminal

Clearance level required 5

Override Puppeteer Activated

Welcome Chief Overseer,

proceed here
 
Last edited:
-Support

- Didn't mention all the duties of SA ( Auth Passive breaches, Auth Mass term, Enabling site wide lockdown ect.)
- You have issues when it comes to power, You either abuse it or forget it exists.
- Not the best lore (Got promoted to LT in 7 days????, Also E-11 isn't a redacted regiment <Not in server lore>)


+Not the worst app
+Has held IA Ambassador and E-11 LT


Overall, SA isn't really suited for you Harvey, I still wish you all the luck.
 

Kayla

Administrator
Administrator
SCP-RP Staff
Resources Team
Oct 20, 2023
245
51
61
-support
Application is mid.
I haven't really seen you much since becoming E-11 CO so I can't comment on what you're like now a days, but before that the interactions were not good.
I personally don't feel you're suited for a position like SA.
 
-/+neutral - Leaning + support
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

- Good interactions
- Active
- Professional
- HUGE LORE
------------------------------------------
- Short application
- Missing role duties required


////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
 
Last edited:
Jan 20, 2024
258
58
41
-Support

- Didn't mention all the duties of SA ( Auth Passive breaches, Auth Mass term, Enabling site wide lockdown ect.)
- You have issues when it comes to power, You either abuse it or forget it exists.
- Not the best lore (Got promoted to LT in 7 days????, Also E-11 isn't a redacted regiment <Not in server lore>)


+Not the worst app
+Has held IA Ambassador and E-11 LT


Overall, SA isn't really suited for you Harvey, I still wish you all the luck.
In most circumstances if not all with me practically playing only E-11 the only time I interact with you is with you as one of my higher-ups and if you were to witness such a thing then it would be your obligation as a CPT who has full authority over anyone LT and below to report this which has not happened as if it would have been then I would have been talked to which has not happened. So frankly you cannot say that I have issues with my power when in your own power as a CO and a punishment officer within the regiment it is your Duty to report this which has not been done and is a straight-up betrayal to the CO team if you have failed to report such a thing which if this power abuse were to be true is what you have done.
 
Jan 20, 2024
258
58
41
-support
Application is mid.
I haven't really seen you much since becoming E-11 CO so I can't comment on what you're like now a days, but before that the interactions were not good.
I personally don't feel you're suited for a position like SA.
I understand where you are coming from as my time spent as an NCO was not the best representation of what I have to give to the regiment which has been a major thing that I have worked on in recent days, but still thank you for giving your opinion.
 
Jan 20, 2024
258
58
41
-/+neutral - Leaning + support
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

- Good interactions
- Active
- Professional
- HUGE LORE
------------------------------------------
- Short application
- Missing role duties required


////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
thank you very much you give valid points on where there are faults. Thank you for commenting on my application.
 
Jan 20, 2024
258
58
41
-Support

- Didn't mention all the duties of SA ( Auth Passive breaches, Auth Mass term, Enabling site wide lockdown ect.)
- You have issues when it comes to power, You either abuse it or forget it exists.
- Not the best lore (Got promoted to LT in 7 days????, Also E-11 isn't a redacted regiment <Not in server lore>)


+Not the worst app
+Has held IA Ambassador and E-11 LT


Overall, SA isn't really suited for you Harvey, I still wish you all the luck.
when it comes to my lore it doesn't say that I got LT 7 days after I joined E-11. there is a 1 month and 7 days gap between the two events and that's without accounting for the redacted year which shows that I could have been promoted to LT 1 year after 2 and so on it never states that and really just because 1 or two dates are seen as being close it does make it a red flag, but at the end of the day you have the right to your own opinion and I accept that.
 
-Support leaning +/- Neutral

- Some misunderstandings or omissions as to the duties of SA
- Occasional poor interactions
- Has had issues with power & responsibilities at times

- Lore is fine but not without criticism
- Active
- Performs duties within E-11 well
 
Last edited:

6n2rAtL.png



The following message is composed via consensus of the site administration team of site-65.

Hello, @Harvey Bridger

Thank you for showing an interest in expanding your duties within the Foundation. After careful consideration, we have come to a verdict regarding this personnel role reassignment request. This request is to be denied. The reasons for this denial may be elaborated on should you decide to get in contact with us. No further action is required.

You may re-apply in two weeks' time.

Secure. Contain. Protect.




CONFIDENTIAL
This document may not be shared with or used by personnel below the designated clearance level.​


 
Status
Not open for further replies.