Denied Lobby BDs change

This suggestion has been denied and will not receive development.
Status
Not open for further replies.
May 12, 2025
101
6
41
What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
Make only one of the Lower Lobby FSL doors able to be closed which should be the main one, not the EZ maintenance one,
OR
Make both doors closable and add a rule to indicate that these specific doors can't be used to combat CI raids.

Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
There were some suggestions for the FSL doors before, most of them were denied, but that was before the Lobby update.
There was another suggestion to make them able to close during FSL, but due to dev time this is not going to happen in the near future.

Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
- Helps during code blacks that these doors can be closed to stop SCPs from escaping to surface easily because during code black people will be coming in waves, and you cannot really close them after everyone evacuate, especially after the removal of the upper Lobby Turrets and placing them only in the in-site part.
- Make the EZ turrets more efficient, because after they were removed from the top lobby part they became very useless from what I have seen, SCPs could easily run if the FSL isn't on or the doors opened for a code black.

Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
- Some CI MG raids could get a bit harder during C5s, since they have to push from compound which is a lot secure now. But the chances are very low for them to raid during a C5 and this could happen right now if FSL is on, so its very low chance.
- Some SCP players might complain?

Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
This suggestion should be accepted because it fixes an issue without heavily impacting balance with little draw backs.
The downside for CI raids is minimal and can be managed with rules or just making only one door closable so they will have another route, Also SCPs need to become more strategic instead of relying on an easy escape during code blacks or when people forget to put FSL on. (Most CL4s dont care about FSL sadly they need to lock in)
 
Suggestion Denied



Hi @Lonix ,

Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion.

The Content Team has chosen to deny your suggestion due to the following reason(s):

The blast-doors you mentioned were specifically made to only be closed during Full-Site Lockdowns, thus we believe this change is not needed.

Your suggestion will now be locked and marked as denied.​
 
Status
Not open for further replies.