What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
Makes a rule (or adds a clarification rule) about the length of time a Code 1 (Intruder Alert) can remain on after a raid/intruder has initial been called out (or after a 914 has been called out set to 1:1) - I'd recommend a period of like 5 minutes although I'm unsure how good that would be.
Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
As far as I'm aware no, although it more than likely has (as I don't think the suggestion is very complex).
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
- Allow people who are deeply undercover to remain that way, and not have to be ID checked a bunch of time after the Code 1 should've been stopped
- Means that a almost permanent code 1 can't be in effect, which would allow people to randomly ID/Kant check people without reason, which is just annoying
- Doesn't allow people to use 1 sighting of a intruder as a reason to sweep everyone for disguises/IDs (e.g using the fact that a Parawatch has sneaked in to call a Code 1 to then check others)
- Can allow for some more disguised RP without being quickly caught
- May reduce meta gaming to catch disguised people, as people would no longer have a reason to "randomly" ID check.
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
- Would strengthen people who are deep covers / disguised people
- May be hard for staff (or players) to know specifically when this rule is being broken.
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
I simply believe that adding a rule like this would make it more fun, the amount of times I've been found out as a disguised person because of a prolonged C1 (which wasn't about me in the first place) has probably been more than the amount of times I was found out because of my own mistakes. It would also reduce the situations where disguised people are being found out for Code 1s / ID checks for things that weren't their fault. I also think this change would value long term sneakier disguised people rather than "disguised just to cause chaos" people because they would be refreshing the Code 1 situation whilst a person who is more so RPing out their disguise/using it for information wouldn't be.
Makes a rule (or adds a clarification rule) about the length of time a Code 1 (Intruder Alert) can remain on after a raid/intruder has initial been called out (or after a 914 has been called out set to 1:1) - I'd recommend a period of like 5 minutes although I'm unsure how good that would be.
Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
As far as I'm aware no, although it more than likely has (as I don't think the suggestion is very complex).
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
- Allow people who are deeply undercover to remain that way, and not have to be ID checked a bunch of time after the Code 1 should've been stopped
- Means that a almost permanent code 1 can't be in effect, which would allow people to randomly ID/Kant check people without reason, which is just annoying
- Doesn't allow people to use 1 sighting of a intruder as a reason to sweep everyone for disguises/IDs (e.g using the fact that a Parawatch has sneaked in to call a Code 1 to then check others)
- Can allow for some more disguised RP without being quickly caught
- May reduce meta gaming to catch disguised people, as people would no longer have a reason to "randomly" ID check.
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
- Would strengthen people who are deep covers / disguised people
- May be hard for staff (or players) to know specifically when this rule is being broken.
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
I simply believe that adding a rule like this would make it more fun, the amount of times I've been found out as a disguised person because of a prolonged C1 (which wasn't about me in the first place) has probably been more than the amount of times I was found out because of my own mistakes. It would also reduce the situations where disguised people are being found out for Code 1s / ID checks for things that weren't their fault. I also think this change would value long term sneakier disguised people rather than "disguised just to cause chaos" people because they would be refreshing the Code 1 situation whilst a person who is more so RPing out their disguise/using it for information wouldn't be.
Last edited: