Denied Make some kind of restriction when the opposite team has a 5+ or less lead.

[SaltyBoi]

What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
Adds some kind of restriction such as less vehicles or no assets, ETC. ER or PCs shouldnt count towards the amount of people one team has.

Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
Lets the team that will be behind in players actually have a fighting chance. Possibly will allow both teams to have more fun with the opposing team not having as many vehicles up and camping FOBs.

Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
The team with more players may not like having restrictions put onto them. Could lead to the opposing team be majorly behind if the team with less players still has access to vehicles.

Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
Personally I think it would allow people to have more fun and give the team with less players a chance to win the war or lose less territory. Obviously there will be some balancing issues with what to restrict and such but I think it can be done well.

 

[drako dormus]

neutral
there are already things implemented to fight against outnumbering

+ support
needs a bit more things for outnumbered people

 

[Latin]

+support
a great number of people agree that 5-10 more players on one side is enough to heavily influence a war, especially when its double the player count (it would take your entire force to capture a point, while the enemy with double the numbers could just easily use the other half to capture a different zone, due to capture rate being terrible compensation)

 

[SaltyBoi]

neutral
there are already things implemented to fight against outnumbering

+ support
needs a bit more things for outnumbered people

I havent seen anything to fight against it, on the US server there was a war that NATO had 5 to 10 people and NWO had 19 to 24 throughout the war and NATO was getting steamrolled. Seemed like a normal war for US NATO tbh.

 

[Latin]

I havent seen anything to fight against it, on the US server there was a war that NATO had 5 to 10 people and NWO had 19 to 24 throughout the war and NATO was getting steamrolled. Seemed like a normal war for US NATO tbh.

me: mentions all the times like a week or two ago there was 35-45 NWO to only 15-20 NATO (we legit lost like 40% of the map in a single war, could only defend a single territory)

 

[Redrrx]

-Support

 

[sahns]

Suggestion Denied​

---

Hi Salty, Your suggestion has been denied.

The last thing we want to do, is to tell the regiments that they can't do what they're supossed to do, therefore the suggestion will be denied.​