What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
[This suggestion aims to add an amount measurement to vials, beakers, flasks and more that contains an unknown substance.]
Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
[Not from what I have seen, no]
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
[At the moment, whenever you create a new chemical either via mixing, burning or through the vacuum, you get... Unknown substance... how much? eh, good question, because the game doesn't tell you. It's especially annoying with stuff such as O- blood or potent deluxotine, where you can't really see if there's residue of deluxotine behind in your potent, causing a lot of mixing around and time wasting... idk, I'm not a chem guy, I just know that all the times I've worked with chems, I've been greatly annoyed that I don't know HOW MUCH UNKNOWN SUBSTANCE IS IN THE BEAKER... I mean, the beakers already have measurements on them, so why do we need to analyse the substance before figuring out that it contains... 300 ml]
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
[Even if I tried my best, and sat for 300 years, meditating to clear my mind... I could not find a single negative for this suggestion]
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
[This should be accepted to make chem handling less frustrating... the positives outweigh the negatives by an infinite amount, considering there are no negatives to this suggestion]
[This suggestion aims to add an amount measurement to vials, beakers, flasks and more that contains an unknown substance.]
Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
[Not from what I have seen, no]
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
[At the moment, whenever you create a new chemical either via mixing, burning or through the vacuum, you get... Unknown substance... how much? eh, good question, because the game doesn't tell you. It's especially annoying with stuff such as O- blood or potent deluxotine, where you can't really see if there's residue of deluxotine behind in your potent, causing a lot of mixing around and time wasting... idk, I'm not a chem guy, I just know that all the times I've worked with chems, I've been greatly annoyed that I don't know HOW MUCH UNKNOWN SUBSTANCE IS IN THE BEAKER... I mean, the beakers already have measurements on them, so why do we need to analyse the substance before figuring out that it contains... 300 ml]
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
[Even if I tried my best, and sat for 300 years, meditating to clear my mind... I could not find a single negative for this suggestion]
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
[This should be accepted to make chem handling less frustrating... the positives outweigh the negatives by an infinite amount, considering there are no negatives to this suggestion]