What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
This will add the MRP FOB system to SCP RP.
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
A Positive change this would add would be furthering surface rp as members of Nu-7/CI/UNGOC could add FOBS on the surface for surface-dwelling GOIs and Civis to explore.
Another positive change would be furthering rp down in the facility. They could add custom props to the FOB stations that allow trusted members of the foundation to make FOBS structures down in the facility such as an E-11 Check Point in LCZ, a Medical Checkpoint around the facility, or a desk for foundation personnel to use such as ethics when they go near interro to answer questions about ethics.
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
A possible negative is that it would take a lot of time to transfer the code from MRP to SCPRP.
Another possible negative would be that the new addition might make the server slightly laggy.
Also, a possible negative would be that modeling the props to fit within the SCPRP server might take massive time and effort from the content team and modelers.
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
Based on both positive and negative for this suggestion, the reason this suggestion should be accepted is that it adds a way for all members of the foundation and other gois to further RP which helps further the interests of all members of the server.
This will add the MRP FOB system to SCP RP.
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
A Positive change this would add would be furthering surface rp as members of Nu-7/CI/UNGOC could add FOBS on the surface for surface-dwelling GOIs and Civis to explore.
Another positive change would be furthering rp down in the facility. They could add custom props to the FOB stations that allow trusted members of the foundation to make FOBS structures down in the facility such as an E-11 Check Point in LCZ, a Medical Checkpoint around the facility, or a desk for foundation personnel to use such as ethics when they go near interro to answer questions about ethics.
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
A possible negative is that it would take a lot of time to transfer the code from MRP to SCPRP.
Another possible negative would be that the new addition might make the server slightly laggy.
Also, a possible negative would be that modeling the props to fit within the SCPRP server might take massive time and effort from the content team and modelers.
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
Based on both positive and negative for this suggestion, the reason this suggestion should be accepted is that it adds a way for all members of the foundation and other gois to further RP which helps further the interests of all members of the server.
Donator
Community Sup.
Content Team
Group Moderator