Donator
- Dec 25, 2020
- 465
- 217
- 71
What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
This would add in a new war type that focuses on the three territories that are immediately contensted. This would be similar to a lane war, but instead of all three territories being on a single lane, it's one territory per lane.
For example: If NWO own all of the map, the territories that could be captured would be Village, Checkpoint and Border. If UAN own the map, then Mountain, West Town and Mosque.
This could be added in as an alternative flash war, or as an entire war itself.
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
It adds a bit more variety to war types, it'd be a neat concept to test out. It also gives teams with less territory an opportunity to capture some back without having to focus on defending, gets more people into the fight.
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
People may find it irritating they can only fight on certain points, and if a team owns an entire lane there won't be much to contest. In the cases of a lane being owned partially by one, it's difficult to determine which territory should be the one contested. (If a lane is split, then the middle territory should be contested)
A way around this is having a defensive border skirmish and an offensive, if your team is on the offensive then your territories are not contested, if defensive, then they are.
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
It'd be difficult to implement, but it'd give a nice bit of variety to the war types.
This would add in a new war type that focuses on the three territories that are immediately contensted. This would be similar to a lane war, but instead of all three territories being on a single lane, it's one territory per lane.
For example: If NWO own all of the map, the territories that could be captured would be Village, Checkpoint and Border. If UAN own the map, then Mountain, West Town and Mosque.
This could be added in as an alternative flash war, or as an entire war itself.
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
It adds a bit more variety to war types, it'd be a neat concept to test out. It also gives teams with less territory an opportunity to capture some back without having to focus on defending, gets more people into the fight.
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
People may find it irritating they can only fight on certain points, and if a team owns an entire lane there won't be much to contest. In the cases of a lane being owned partially by one, it's difficult to determine which territory should be the one contested. (If a lane is split, then the middle territory should be contested)
A way around this is having a defensive border skirmish and an offensive, if your team is on the offensive then your territories are not contested, if defensive, then they are.
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
It'd be difficult to implement, but it'd give a nice bit of variety to the war types.
Upvote
6
