Denied MTF Chemicals

This suggestion has been denied and will not receive development.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Lonsy

Moderator
Moderator
SCP-RP Staff
Jul 30, 2024
33
8
21
Australia
What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
Ability for MTF to use/create Class A and other chemicals involved with their protection of the Foundation

Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different:
I am currently unsure if anyone has suggested it, I think they would have.

Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
-Gives MTF of certain rank (preferably NCO) the ability to use readily accessible Class A, and, other Chemicals, to carry out their duties
-Creates some research ability within MTF to extract samples for use as above. Even asking research directly to organize a supply


Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
-It may minimise Researchers from making credits with selling chemicals/samples "under the table"
-It may speed up scenarios and situations from the ability to have the chemicals on hand, rather than relying on Research to attend and supply


Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
I believe it will give a positive impact with MTF, having them learn the chemical/research basics to carry out the samples and development.
With it being rank restricted it will avoid any minge behaviour and use, if not, they would receive a punishment for their abuse.
 

Yeke

Community Manager
Community Manager
Group Moderator
Mar 20, 2022
980
6
244
71
This was stopped as it literally drove research into the ground, because everyone wanted to do everything, and then it became a point of "why join research or medical, I can do this in MTF", I am not in favor of the suggestion for that reason, people too often want to find ways to not have to speak with other people.
 
Jan 1, 2022
307
1
80
91
19
Suggestion Denied

Hi @Lonsy,

Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion.
The Content Team has chosen to deny your suggestion due to the following reasons.

As Yeke has said, there is no reason to do this due to how this would effect research with inter-departmental relations as you'd wouldn't need to interact with research for these things.

Your suggestion will now be locked and marked as denied.​
 
Status
Not open for further replies.